Post by cupcakes on Jul 2, 2017 19:22:23 GMT
tpfkar
@miccee said: I'm asking you to explain why what I've proposed as the most parsimonious (Occam's Razor) explanation for our decisions is not adequate to explain our decision making.
And I haven't stated that we have things chosen for us; because we do make choices. It's just that the choices we make are the only ones that we can make.
And it's amusing that you believe that I think like a child, given that the thousands of words that you have dedicated in defence of free will can be synopsised as "I wan' it. I WAN' IT. I WAAAN' ITTTT!!!!"
I'll just chuckle at your further ongoing ironic intensity.It's only the baseline in the same way that God is the baseline. The fact that it is something popularly believed in does not make it the default belief.
I just like things to make sense.But if your will is formed of thoughts and your thoughts precede your will, then how can your will be free from determinism?
I think that you don't know what your position is.
When you describe what free will is, it's virtually identical to so-called 'compatibilist free will'. Then you say that isn't what you mean and that you believe in indeterministic free will even though we do not choose our own nature and preferences.

And if society wants the fairest possible state of affairs, that would mean no humans and no society.
