Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2017 23:31:30 GMT
Exactly.
They didn't earn it. It carried zero emotion weight and was completely wasted. It's a prime example of how bad the writing for DC has been and there are numerous examples that have contributed to the poor reception of the entire brand.
I agree that Quicksilver's death in AoU carried zero emotion weight and was completely wasted. It's a prime example of how bad the writing for AoU was and there are numerous examples that have contributed to the poor reception of that film. Are all DC fans are stupid as you? Your attempts at trying to twist our issues with the death of Superman by bringing up Quicksilver just fail, because of the huge difference in prestige and importance the two characters have. Superman is... Superman. He's the Big Blue Boyscout, THE SUPERHERO. He's been the face of the band since the 30s, our grandparents/great grandparents were young, and survived through the decades pretty well. He's practically one of DC's mascots and the first hero introduced in the DCEU, therefore one of its frontrunners. Quicksilver is just a member of an ensemble, and... that's about it. He has neither Superman's status nor his importance to his universe. Killing off Quicksilver in a film where he was just a supporting player, anyway, is in no way equivalent to killing off Superman in just his second appearance in a cinematic universe that's being built off a film he was the star of. Troll smarter next time.
|
|