Post by Vegas on Mar 2, 2017 12:55:49 GMT
Okay.. So far I think we're cool with just about everything.. Let's see if we can work through this last little bit:
As for the "act in faith based on evidence and reason," my general issue is what role you think the "faith" plays beyond the evidence and reason.
To them, "faith" is a religious word, and therefore... it must be stupid.
"It can't be reasonable, the religious are uneasonable."
But.. There is far more non-religious things one can put faith in.
And there are reasons for that faith.
Hell.. The one dictionary definition uses this sentence as its example:
"This restored his faith in the politician"
Well.... What did?
Obviously, it is a reference to something seen.. a bit of evidence.. that he could now base his faith on.
His faith had evidence.
THE END.
And they all lived happily ever after.
