|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on Aug 12, 2017 3:51:48 GMT
sdrew13163 but it's not all that much right? like there is more of a difference between SD to HD than bluray to 4k, right? like i guess my point is... 4k is more expendable(like if you can get it, fine. if not, it's not a big deal) vs basic HD. (hell, in my personal opinion... unless a movie is more visual/atmosphere oriented i can even get by with SD no problem) but given you said, "After that, I'm not sure anything above 4K will even be noticeable." ; i have a feeling you basically agree with me (or at least mostly). I voted for "It's getting a bit ridiculous" as well. I agree, I don't think 4K is absolutely a necessity, but it is nice. It's not something I would buy myself, but it looks good on other people's TV's. Nothing above 4K will probably even be noticeable to the human eye lol. They should probably stop here.
|
|