Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2017 11:54:34 GMT
...were individual sports? I mean they would still be terrible games, but think about it, in cricket there are only 2 guys who are doing anything at any one point, the bowler and the batter, the other 20 guys are either doing nothing, or next to nothing. Same really with baseball. So why not just turn them into individual sports? The real things that make up cricket interesting are little things like clever field placements, batting order, smart bowling changes, chaos and confusion in the field in exciting circumstances and the biggest of them all the mental strength to outsmart the opposition with tactics. It is less a game of reflexes and more of tactics, intelligence and exploiting weakness of those who are not mentally strong. your worst post ever stan I know it will take you guys a little bit of time to get your heads around it, you're used to things being one way, and when a progressive comes along to tell you "things could be better" there is bound to be a bit of resistance, that's only natural, I understand that. But I dunno, let it sink in for a day or two, be open minded. Change can be good.
|
|