|
|
Post by gadreel on Aug 14, 2017 22:57:39 GMT
Then your reading comprehension is poor. Sorry, but when it's noted he didn't offer the statement on the tragedy until AFTER multiple parties pressed him publicly and you ask where he's "caving", it looks either dim or deliberate. "Unacceptable?"  Nothing. The timing is telling, though. Didn't want to cheese off his supremacist votes. The timing is neither here nor there. Did you find anything in the speech to dispute? Proof incontrovertible. Once again someone has answered your question but because you don't like the answer, you avoid the point they made and ask the question again. is this more of your trying to get a raise out of people or do you expect us to believe that this level of dishonesty is typical of the correct sort of Christianity that you represent.
|
|