Post by DC-Fan on Aug 15, 2017 23:11:03 GMT
The suspension will be appealed so that might not be the final decision. So it doesn't make sense to comment on something that might not be final.
It's like when Berman made his incorrect decision to strike down Brady's 4-game suspension and then all you Brady fanboys kept saying that Brady was exonerated and the case was over. But I kept saying that the case wasn't over and the appellate court would probably overturn Berman's incorrect decision so we should wait for the appellate court's decision. And the appellate court affirmed that Brady was guilty of cheating and re-instated Brady's 4-game suspension for cheating.
In this case, the suspension is being appealed so an Arbitrator will be assigned and there'll be an Arbitration hearing so it doesn't make sense to comment now when the final decision hasn't been handed down yet.
Nice deflection. When it was Brady you commented every step of the way, from teh initial suspension to the many appeals, now all of the sudden it's not fair to do that? Remember this initial suspension came from the corrupt commissioner himself, so why not answer the question of whether you think his initial decision is fair or not? Are you hoping for someone other than Goodell to hear the appeal so that you can say Goodells decision is meaningless so there's no point in commenting on it?
We can all see right through you, you know it's an incorrect decision but are afraid to say so because it negates all your claims of fairness in the Brady case.
What does the Elliott case have to do with the Brady case? It's 2 different un-related cases, just like the O.J. case and the Aaron Hernandez case were 2 different un-related cases.
In Brady's case, it was an integrity of the competition violation and the offender was not only caught red-handed but also tried to obstruct the investigation. In Elliott's case, the allegations are player misconduct that has nothing to do with integrity of the competition.