Post by ctown28 on Aug 16, 2017 1:50:27 GMT
We can all see right through you, you know it's an incorrect decision but are afraid to say so because it negates all your claims of fairness in the Brady case.
What does the Elliott case have to do with the Brady case? It's 2 different un-related cases, just like the O.J. case and the Aaron Hernandez case were 2 different un-related cases.
In Brady's case, it was an integrity of the competition violation and the offender was not only caught red-handed but also tried to obstruct the investigation. In Elliott's case, the allegations are player misconduct that has nothing to do with integrity of the competition.
You don't see the similarity between the two? Both suspended for an excessive amount of games after cherry picking the evidence that makes them look guilty but ignoring everything that exonerates them?
Why not just answer the question of what you think about Goodell's initial ruling? I know why you won't answer it and everyone else does, because it will out you as the hypocrite that everyone knows you are. You don't want to admit the commssioner is corrupt and has his own agenda.