Post by Arlon10 on Aug 19, 2017 19:40:18 GMT
Just you and I typing is more evidence alone that I exist than anything anybody has presented for a god.
Can you present anything for a god that is as good as you and I typing?
Also what does proving I exist have to do with justifying that a god does?
One way to look at it is in regard to things that science is utterly useless to even address, much less solve. When everyone agrees what the problem is, science can often be of some help at least. However the problem with most issues in society is that there is no agreement what the problem is. That's what makes them issues in the first place. If everyone agreed we need more raincoats then science can start turning out raincoats on a production line. Suppose some people decide we don't need more raincoats and everyone should just stay inside when rains? What good is science now? What approach to the problem is most "rational" now? The people who want to stay inside might want more candles, don't forget that.
Most problems in this world are totally beyond your hopelessly shallow understanding. Your attitude fails to address real problems, the actual issues. You're stuck on elementary puzzles any child could solve. There are other arts you refuse to study. You then are a big part of the problem. Religion is necessary to help people decide on ultimate approaches and goals, whether to go out in the rain at all. Science is totally useless for that, and you are totally wrong not to see it.
You need to quit infecting people with your disease and allow the study of some god of ultimate purposes. That is just one god that exists obviously to millions of people. There is another. An intelligent designer is an issue in science, not religion. It's the correct answer to one of those elementary puzzles, how did life originally arise on a previously molten planet?