|
|
Post by gadreel on Aug 20, 2017 19:59:51 GMT
It's not that I think the universe needs intelligence, it is that I find that my model of the universe is best explained as if it had intelligence behind it. I realise that is a pretty pedantic distinction but it makes sense to me. And yes I get that an intelligence requires more complexity, to be honest I don't think that is an argument against it, if there is an intelligence of nor is not predicated on the required complexity, it either is or it is not ,I accept that in statistical terms this is less likely, but statistically whatever is behind our universe is behind 100% of the universes that we are aware of. Ok, I guess what I'm asking is, if we know that all we see can form naturally, how does introducing the idea that intelligence is involved, better explain it? It's not that it "better" explains it, it is that I feel that it is a more comfortable interpretation for me. |
|
