|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Aug 20, 2017 23:17:28 GMT
Ok, I guess what I'm asking is, if we know that all we see can form naturally, how does introducing the idea that intelligence is involved, better explain it? It's not that it "better" explains it, it is that I feel that it is a more comfortable interpretation for me. So you're more comfortable with something you have no idea has any truth value? I don't get it.
Why not just be comfortable with saying you don't know anything about it? Why make up an answer that has no truth value?
|
|