|
|
Post by gadreel on Aug 20, 2017 23:39:30 GMT
It's not that it "better" explains it, it is that I feel that it is a more comfortable interpretation for me. So you're more comfortable with something you have no idea has any truth value? I don't get it.
Why not just be comfortable with saying you don't know anything about it? Why make up an answer that has no truth value?
Yeah this is why it is a long conversation. I am not talking about what is or is not the truth, we simply don't know the truth. At the end of the day the interpretation of the universe that I have (based mostly on judeo-Christian mystery thought) lends itself better to being started by an intelligence, I am not making any kind of truth claim, I am not arrogant enough to assume I know, I know that I do not know. All I am saying is that when I interpret the universe it makes more sense to me to interpret it as based off intelligence. To be clear there is no currently known truth value to this question, at the end of the day everyone is either ignoring the question or making up a truth value (assuming the claim to have a truth), I am very careful to not claim any truth as I am aware that as humans we simply do not know it yet.
|
|