|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Aug 21, 2017 19:34:04 GMT
Awesome, so great dialog here and I think we've gotten to a really interesting point.
I have two subtley different questions about personal preference here. Why is it a factor at all? And why is intelligence your preference, or more importantly, why isn't your preference for an accurate view of reality, whether an intelligence is involved or not?
Why is intelligence a factor??? Not really sure I understand the question, but I guess you are asking me why do I care??? I think that (given we do not know) at the end of the day we all make a choice as to whether we think an intelligence is involved or not, I choose to think there is. There is no other reason than personal interpretation and comfort of choice. My preference is for an accurate view of reality (in as much as it can be), and as I have said previously I defer to science and understanding first, like I say it isnot even really a truth claim it is a matter of interpretation. To put it another way, even if I knew for a fact that an intelligence was not involved, my model of the universe would still have to change before I abandoned interpreting the universe as if it was sourced from an intelligence. Another way of looking at it is that I don't really care what the final truth is, my model of the universe interprets the source as intelligent, my model would have to change first. This is why I am very adamant that I am not making a truth claim, I am instead holding a model of interpretation in my head that allows me to come to grips with the reality I face. No I'm asking why personal preference is a factor.
Regarding the second response though, so if you knew 100% that an intelligence wasn't involved you would still have a model that interprets an intelligence as being involved. Ok. I'm just a little confused as I'm sure what value that has then. If you knew an intelligence wasn't involved, why would you have a model that one was? I'm having trouble conceiving why. Wouldn't you just change your model?
|
|