|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Aug 23, 2017 22:01:01 GMT
It's a multiverse. That's how they can have a Superman and a Flash in the movies and a Superman and a Flash on the CW TV shows. This is no different. The Joker did have an origin in the comics. He was a thief who wore a Red Hood and was the 1 criminal whom Batman could never catch or identify who he was. The problem with having a separate DC movie franchise that is not connected with the rest of the DCEU is that it creates brand confusion, doesn't matter how good or bad the product could be it will still puzzle a lot of people. This will be especially confusing if The Joker appears in another movie
So basically like the confusion when AoU had Quicksilver #2 after X-Men: Days of Future Past had Quicksilver #1?
Or like the confusion when The Avengers had Hulk #3 (Mark Ruffalo) after The Incredible Hulk had Hulk #2 (Edward Norton) after Hulk had Hulk #1 (Eric Bana)?
Or like the confusion when MCU had Rhodey #2 (Don Cheadle) after they had Rhodey #1 (Terence Howard)?
|
|