Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2017 2:54:38 GMT
See, if you weren't clinging on to some kind of supernatural definition of free will, then you would not have any objection to the conclusion that the authors of these studies had reached, because it would be obvious to you. The only definition of 'free will' that does not dovetail with the conclusions reached by that article (or Libet, or Soon et al) would be one that does not adhere to naturalistic processes.
|
|