Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2017 14:55:14 GMT
You seem to be holding out some forlorn hope that humans are more than mere organic robots, which naturalistic processes would (somewhat ironically) entail. You don't seem to know what you believe about free will (much like a Christian struggling with his faith yet refusing to throw in the towel) and are afraid to find out. Directly from your posts, you seem to be a morose mental case, willing to post the most absurd of things pulled directly out of your ass to support your rabidly morbid faith.  I only know what we see and the science is able to establish and describe at any given time. And I further recognize attempted sleights via lugubriously emotional non-sequitur, frantic distortion, comedic overstatement, apparent obliviousness to patent senselessness of position, and free representation of controversial and contradicted speculation as fact -whether in support of eternal life or death religions- as the stuff of cultists of one kind or another. The 'organic robot' paradigm of human decision making is now scientific orthodoxy, and there are no credible challenges to this (the best you've ever been able to come up with is 'Can Neuroscience Understand Donkey Kong'. So clearly you have difficulty accepting what is established by science if it goes against what you wish to be true. And telling that you would link my antinatalism with this. It seems as if you want to believe in meaningful 'free will' because the bleak and meaningless universe that I describe in my posts is the only alternative to free will universe. You haven't been able to explain how individuals acting with free will could be distinguished from those acting without free will. In a universe without free will, would individuals not also act in accordance with their preferences and traits?
|
|