Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2017 14:15:21 GMT
tpfkar
Sept 6, 2017 20:04:53 GMT @miccee said:
just because the parents feel that their own lives will be enriched by the addition of childrenAnd of course pretense that there is some zero-sum karma where "atheists" having kids and taking care of them means that kids from wretched areas must be sacrificed in figurative volcanoes, or that "to fully protect from risk and harm" is even a reasonable goal, is just more grim comedy for the specicide dreams.
If true, then it is cute, cuddly, fuzzy and multicultural because Muslims are (mostly) brown. That takes precedence over any moral concern.
I'm not drawing any causal link between the pampered first world atheist and the Bangladeshi sweatshop worker; although the latter will spend his entire life being oppressed in order to make the existence of the former a little bit easier. But I suppose it's worth the suffering of the child slave in the Bangladeshi clothes factory so that you will be able to buy your own clothes cheaply, right?
If we're going to bring new life in to this world, then it should behoove us to ensure that it is going to be fair and safe for absolutely everyone before we do it, and that there are only winners and never losers. Otherwise, you are basically behaving like that despot from the Old Testament who you would undoubtedly criticise for being derelict in his duty of care.
Sounds to me like you made the right choice. I'm pretty sure the horribly scarred bitter broken and the morbid depressive misanthropes won't be the ones making things improve.
It's not going to be the "I'm in this for whatever is in it for me, and to hell with the collateral damage" brigade that makes things improve.