|
|
Post by cupcakes on Sept 9, 2017 0:21:33 GMT
tpfkar So make life better for them. Still nothing attached to child-rearing inherently. Obviously not a straight-forward task that can be accomplished before anyone else has to experience more suffering. There should be a guarantee of no non-trivial suffering before any more lives are introduced. Which is impossible because, even if things had somehow gotten rectified in the present time so that nobody had to suffer, it would be impossible to guarantee that such a utopian situation could not be destabilised or destroyed. And it is related to child rearing (or child birthing, more precisely), because the person could not experience suffering were they never to have been born. For the mentally sound, when there's a problem one works on addressing it with something short of genocide+. If one still possesses one's faculties, anyway. But that boat sailed long before more of that boobie hatch banter about dead can't care no risk of splinter is moral attacking nonexistent babies by giving them a shot at life. Not with guys like you, for sure. In truth, things keep trending better even with the zealot bumps, as the sociopathic mentally ill rarely gain power once liberalism takes hold, and when they do they are generally time-limited. And they shouldn't be expected to pay the price of everyone else's joy. Especially if nobody would be deprived of that joy in a universe with no sentient life.
|
|