Post by cupcakes on Sept 12, 2017 22:30:37 GMT
tpfkar
Sept 12, 2017 21:49:49 GMT @miccee said:
tpfka
Babbled out of-the-ass blather, much like "Organic Robot Paradigm".
As you repeatedly demonstrate, people can and do subscribe to any manner of self-contradictory, dishonest, and emotion-fed views.
As related many times before, because of the patent uncertainty of whether the illness or the person's actual desires are speaking. The vast majority are some kind of stress-induced and/or treatable conditions in which they need help, and certainly not partisan malice in the guise of "freedom" for their pathology.
And of course, the "Original Sin" of harming nonexistent kids by having them does not exist. But the religious do still push that kind of inanity.
And of course, the "Original Sin" of harming nonexistent kids by having them does not exist. But the religious do still push that kind of inanity.
And if the Christian God would be worthy of criticism by forcing sentient beings to live in a harmful and dangerous world, then logically that must also apply to those who know of the harms and dangers, yet still see fit to subject a new life to those risks.
If a physically sound patient can't get the trivially accomplished once actually decided deed done without involving other people, then nobody has any business sending them to their doom.The Christian God is worthy of criticism for purposely causing harm. If he's giving a shot at this blast and it's the best he can manage, and he's actually a sweetheart without all of the malice in the Bible, I'll personally buy him all the beer he can knock back. And nobody who is not deranged or making narcissistic scenes is "forced", regardless if you personally don't have the gonads.
No, you have repeatedly cited your war against religion as opposed to honest inquiry/appraisal as your motivation.
In what you pretend, you'd have to have been made at the start to be some combination fundamentally dishonest with the bizarre slants/ emotional non sequiturs, and cognitively impaired enough to not be able to grok that believing no alteration is possible yet trying furiously to make things "better". For the undertakers and sociopaths, maybe.
In what you pretend, you'd have to have been made at the start to be some combination fundamentally dishonest with the bizarre slants/ emotional non sequiturs, and cognitively impaired enough to not be able to grok that believing no alteration is possible yet trying furiously to make things "better". For the undertakers and sociopaths, maybe.
And if society wants the fairest possible state of affairs, that would mean no humans and no society.
