Post by CoolJGS☺ on Sept 17, 2017 14:26:01 GMT
Sept 17, 2017 13:51:26 GMT @miccee said:

However, to say a government is wrong by withholding it is exactly the same thing as saying government has an responsibility to allow it which is incorrect. They didn't have to do anything and a person can off themselves freely without a government sign-off. The person who feels a need to help people like that simply accepts the risk.
Likewise, to expect the Pope to comment on it in the form of modern ethicism would in effect put an ethics expectation on it when there is none.
If the Pope is against it, there is nothing wrong with that.
Of course, the thread title may be non-factual (I couldn't pull up the article) or a play on words, but taking it at face value, it sounds like something a Pope would say and there is no ethical issue in him saying it.
However, government legalizing it creates a legal ethical standard it has no business in implementing since it obligates others to accept it when there is no logical reason for them to do so when the country has always been unable to stop suicides from happening.
The danger in legalizing it is that if there isn't a doctor willing to kill someone, then how does that person wind up committing suicide? Who pays for it? At what point in time do are doctors and hospital mandated to engage in euthanasia?
Even if one feels there is a government responsibility, when the government allows something, it is only a matter of time when someone whines that they need to make access a priority.
It's est to just let things be the way they always have been which is people have been killing themselves without bureaucracy for centuries. Don't fix what ain't broke.

