Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2017 1:43:16 GMT
tpfkar
Sept 18, 2017 22:25:31 GMT @miccee said:
I've already set out what my argument is, so I'm not doing anything "in lieu of actual argument". If there is any point in my argument which I have left unclear, then please let me know and I will clarify it. I'm observing the fact that certain topics tend to make people very touchy and hostile. Religion is one of them, and antinatalism is another.The arguments you've "set out" are hyper-emotional, unsound inanities. And you couldn't have possibly been more clear in them.
You keep looking for cover in "touchy" because as much as you mock "safe spaces", like all good religious-types you're not able to handle it when your patently unsound arguments are highlighted.
Lay antinatalists tend to be extreme in any position they take and are not only "touchy" and nonsensically projecting and insulting, but oblivious and impervious to the cavernous holes in their thinking, and substantially fall to hyper-dramatic hyper-emotional appeals and cries of victimhood.
If true, then it is cute, cuddly, fuzzy and multicultural because Muslims are (mostly) brown. That takes precedence over any moral concern.
If there be cavernous holes in my reasoning; then why not shine a torch into those caverns. But 'many people enjoy their life, so therefore it doesn't matter if others have to pay for it with lives full of suffering' is a selfish justification which favours those who just happened to have good luck in the lottery.
No other conclusion can be had from your posts. What was it in reply to specifically, as there are a number of your positions that scream it.
The thinking in your posts is positively deranged; you are comically morbid and unable to complete basic reasoning or recognize when your offerings are shattered. You frequently earnestly proffer the most ludicrous of non sequiturs. As a subset. But if you want detail, you should link to specific references so that particular incapacites noted can be covered.
"Saying that I'm mentally ill (in your assessment) and therefore anything I believe must be incorrect is an ad hominem attack." This is a perfect example of the daft workings of your mind. Your words being bizarre is what yields conclusions of your mental incapacity; how you came up with your construction here is just another amazing thing to behold.
The thinking in your posts is positively deranged; you are comically morbid and unable to complete basic reasoning or recognize when your offerings are shattered. You frequently earnestly proffer the most ludicrous of non sequiturs. As a subset. But if you want detail, you should link to specific references so that particular incapacites noted can be covered.
"Saying that I'm mentally ill (in your assessment) and therefore anything I believe must be incorrect is an ad hominem attack." This is a perfect example of the daft workings of your mind. Your words being bizarre is what yields conclusions of your mental incapacity; how you came up with your construction here is just another amazing thing to behold.
Also, unless you can state what the mental illness is, how you have diagnosed it, your qualifications in coming to that diagnosis, and how it invalidates my argument (even if true, you would still need to demonstrate how the argument is faulty...it's not sufficient to cite 'mental illness'), then it is just another trollish ad hominem attack that is used to conceal the weakness of your own argument.
Again, you can provide a link and let's look, or just keep highlighting that you're an Ada class victim-crying easy liar.
And of course "necessary" is not the measure.
And of course "necessary" is not the measure.
If not 'necessary', then what? If 'desirable' is the measure, then that could not speak for those who end up being forced into a life of suffering; it would only speak for those who have the good fortune to be born into a life that is fulfilling.