Post by cupcakes on Sept 19, 2017 4:07:29 GMT
Sept 19, 2017 1:43:16 GMT @miccee said:
tpfkar
And yet you cry "insults" as an argument as well as call people "medievalists", and freely, nonsensically project your personal religiosity.The arguments you've "set out" are hyper-emotional, unsound inanities. And you couldn't have possibly been more clear in them.
You keep looking for cover in "touchy" because as much as you mock "safe spaces", like all good religious-types you're not able to handle it when your patently unsound arguments are highlighted.
Lay antinatalists tend to be extreme in any position they take and are not only "touchy" and nonsensically projecting and insulting, but oblivious and impervious to the cavernous holes in their thinking, and substantially fall to hyper-dramatic hyper-emotional appeals and cries of victimhood.
If true, then it is cute, cuddly, fuzzy and multicultural because Muslims are (mostly) brown. That takes precedence over any moral concern.
I positively encourage it, in fact. There's never been any pro-natalist argument that I haven't had a ready rebuttal for (with the possible exception of Terrapin Station's baffling and irrelevant 'the universe doesn't care, therefore suffering doesn't matter').
Insulting people when someone is looking for a civil discussion in good faith is the behaviour of a 'triggered' individual. When debating antinatalism, I have always remained civil at least up to (and usually well beyond) the point where I am first insulted.
And of course your glowing terms for your frequently reprehensible posting behavior is pure drek. Our first interaction on IMDB you vented your frustration by typo hunting. Then you accuse people of being secretly religious when that's a product of your own reverence in thinking that only religious people can value life, and that the good, common sense, human bits of religion didn't come from people in the first place as opposed to the religion itself. You''re also the guy who loves the alt-right language of "triggered" and "safe space", and asserting that people not liking groups being unfairly tarred wholesale as having some kind of minority fetish.
And in this very thread you moaned about "insults" for criticisms you can't take and tones that you instigate.
If there be cavernous holes in my reasoning; then why not shine a torch into those caverns. But 'many people enjoy their life, so therefore it doesn't matter if others have to pay for it with lives full of suffering' is a selfish justification which favours those who just happened to have good luck in the lottery.
What do you think every post has been doing. Specifically here, the patent irrationality of zero sum. There is no inherent one paying for any other. It's perverse reasoning to suggest that one creature being born should have any intrinsic connection or necessarily anything at all to do with some other distinct creature being born elsewhere. In any case, as you believe they are all "organic robots" and so they cannot have done/do other than what they have done and will do or "feel" other than what they have been preset to "feel" (just another illusion), any talk of "selfish" and "justification" and "favour" is just loony. You're trapped by Fate in your incoherent state as well, but it just highlights your breakdown in not being to recognize that believing that and furiously trying to affect people (or wailing on about "insults" for criticisms, or any other complaint hypocritical or valid) is deranged thinking.And another crash and burn. At it's worst framing it's a reverse-lottery where all win, and the bulk win big. A tiny minority win less, although most of those don't get a ticket in the end. And some's winnings run out and some choose to check out early as their winnings get low. And some just hate winnings, be they big or small.
No other conclusion can be had from your posts. What was it in reply to specifically, as there are a number of your positions that scream it.
The thinking in your posts is positively deranged; you are comically morbid and unable to complete basic reasoning or recognize when your offerings are shattered. You frequently earnestly proffer the most ludicrous of non sequiturs. As a subset. But if you want detail, you should link to specific references so that particular incapacites noted can be covered.
"Saying that I'm mentally ill (in your assessment) and therefore anything I believe must be incorrect is an ad hominem attack." This is a perfect example of the daft workings of your mind. Your words being bizarre is what yields conclusions of your mental incapacity; how you came up with your construction here is just another amazing thing to behold.
The thinking in your posts is positively deranged; you are comically morbid and unable to complete basic reasoning or recognize when your offerings are shattered. You frequently earnestly proffer the most ludicrous of non sequiturs. As a subset. But if you want detail, you should link to specific references so that particular incapacites noted can be covered.
"Saying that I'm mentally ill (in your assessment) and therefore anything I believe must be incorrect is an ad hominem attack." This is a perfect example of the daft workings of your mind. Your words being bizarre is what yields conclusions of your mental incapacity; how you came up with your construction here is just another amazing thing to behold.
I didn't diagnose you medically, and lay people can observe and recognize patently aberrant behavior, and note morbid, hyper-emotional, grossly irrational thinking. And you repeating "need to demonstrate how the argument is faulty" for something demonstrated countless times, as well as pretending that "mental illness" was evidence for a conclusion as opposed to a conclusion based on the cited evidence of your many times noted irrationality and morbidity (and hysterical framing and overt dishonesty) - only reinforces the la-la land you exist in. "trollish ad hominem attack" - poor poor baby, you should find you one of those "safe spaces" when you get "triggered" like that. <== micCee language
Again, you can provide a link and let's look, or just keep highlighting that you're an Ada class victim-crying easy liar.
And of course "necessary" is not the measure.
And of course "necessary" is not the measure.
You drive or use public transport, don't you?
If true, then it is cute, cuddly, fuzzy and multicultural because Muslims are (mostly) brown. That takes precedence over any moral concern.