Post by CoolJGS☺ on Sept 25, 2017 13:39:08 GMT
17 Three years after Sister Takeda died, the Supreme Court of Japan ruled in her favor—agreeing that it was wrong to give her a blood transfusion against her express wishes. The February 29, 2000, decision stated that “the right to decide” in such cases “must be respected as personal rights.” Thanks to Sister Takeda’s determination to fight for her freedom to choose medical treatment in harmony with her Bible-trained conscience, Witnesses in Japan can now receive medical treatment without the fear of a forced blood transfusion.
In this case, no one even knew she had the transfusion, but she couldn't let it go since it was a rights issue.
Again, seemingly no repercussions.
The big problem about the repercussions thing is that there's no reason to discuss something that doesn't happen. You can only deduce from the evidence that no one faces consequences. JW's don't make any indication that they punish people who receive forced transfusions, but sadly in the minds of people that hate them, this is evidence that they actually do something to them.
The news information is sketchy too. Surely some hardworking theophobiacs out there can do the work to look for newspaper articles regarding people who were forced transfusions AND subsequently were disfellowshipped as a result.


