Post by CoolJGS☺ on Sept 25, 2017 15:34:21 GMT
Another flaw the argument...errr question...is that the JW parents would be on the hook in the first place. The article implies that the girl is baptized (Otherwise this wouldn't normally be an issue in the first place).
If that's the case and we pretend that people get in trouble for their choices, the parents would not be the ones in trouble, but rather the girl who chose to be forced to have a transfusion (
)
So they would not be obligated to do whatever the OP thinks is needed for them to stay faithful since the decision is entirely on the daughter as a baptized JW. This, of course, makes it even more unlikely that the transfusion avoidance would be successful.
If that's the case and we pretend that people get in trouble for their choices, the parents would not be the ones in trouble, but rather the girl who chose to be forced to have a transfusion (
)So they would not be obligated to do whatever the OP thinks is needed for them to stay faithful since the decision is entirely on the daughter as a baptized JW. This, of course, makes it even more unlikely that the transfusion avoidance would be successful.