So Is This Jehovah's Witness Parent Off The Hook?

So Is This Jehovah's Witness Parent Off The Hook? Sept 25, 2017 22:16:54 GMT

Quote

Post by cupcakes on Sept 25, 2017 22:16:54 GMT

^tpfkar

Sept 24, 2017 16:28:05 GMT CoolJGS☺ said:

Sept 24, 2017 16:24:29 GMT lowtacks86 said:

Why do you feel the need to give at least tacit defense for all these horrible things JWs do?

1. They aren't that horrible. Most of them either aren;'t a big deal or there's two sides to the story. I have no reason to listen only to the side that is whining is all. IF there is evidence of something sucky on both sides I have never defended it, but pretending that JW's are horrible because they keep to their standards is a stupid opinion to have.

That dizzy rank apologist crazytime never disappoints. What else are they if they keep to and enforce "horrible" standards?

2. This is a good example for non JW's, The girl got the blood transfusions she didn;t want and didn't get the boot from JW's. What's the issue?

That they encourage/press minors and their parents to embrace irresponsible practices that can greatly harm the minors' health and well being.

3. Somebody's gotta do it or else everyone will just whine about something that they not only don't understand, but can't even be bothered to research. It's like me calling you a bonehead just because you disagree with me. I would have to present way more evidence than this post to verify you're said bonehead.

Somebody's gotta defend the horrible? And then you lay out and bitch about an "argument" nobody but you is using. Him disagreeing with your reprehensible position doesn't in any way mean he "doesn't understand" or "hasn't bothered to research". It's positively comical how you blatantly project your explicit actions.

4. Isapop asked the question and I answered. Was it rhetorical? Hint: that question is rhetorical

The parents could choose not to transport their kid to, or choose to remove their kid from transfusion appointments, for one thing. You persist with the dishonest suggestion that the JW positions indicate that parents should comply because of a legal ruling when their doctrine states that they should not.

If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that, when they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them: Then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city, and unto the gate of his place; And they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard. And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, that he die.