Lamest MCU films

Sept 28, 2017 11:31:59 GMT miike80 said:

Sept 28, 2017 11:03:18 GMT formersamhmd said:

Exactly, it meant that instead of taking the lazy way out they had to put effort into building up their characters and making them more A-List (though in the comics, Iron Man and Cap are A-Listers). Now we have Guardians of the Galaxy beating out Superman and Batman at the Movies.

yes, but you don't know what would have happened if they had the rights to Spiderman or X-men. Who's to say if the first MCU movie wouldn't have been Spiderman or X-men?

Yes, that's my point which formersamhmd and all the whiny MCU fans don't seem to comprehend. When you have Michael Jordan on your team, obviously you give him the last shot when the game's on the line. When you have Superman and Batman on your roster, you start with them because they're the biggest hitters in American comics history.

If MCU had Spider-Man, the X-Men, and the Fantastic Four on their roster, they would've started with them rather than shitty characters like Iron Man and Hulk. But MCU didn't have those on their roster so they had no choice but to use shitty characters like Iron Man and Hulk.

Basically, DC had 2 Michael Jordans on their roster so they did the smart thing and used their 2 Michael Jordans to lead the way. MCU didn't have any Michael Jordan on their roster so they had to use shitty characters like Iron Man and Hulk.