|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Oct 8, 2017 13:02:51 GMT
Do you understand that we're agreeing that the distinction doesn't make sense? It's your distinction that isn't making sense. There is no non-illusion, since it is all illusion. Savvy! The distinction is an illusion/non-illusion distinction. That is unavoidable if we're saying that something is an illusion. Otherwise what are we saying about it when we say that it's an illusion? |
|
