|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Oct 8, 2017 13:15:30 GMT
It's your distinction that isn't making sense. There is no non-illusion, since it is all illusion. Savvy! The distinction is an illusion/non-illusion distinction. That is unavoidable if we're saying that something is an illusion. Otherwise what are we saying about it when we say that it's an illusion? There is NO distinction, when there is NO separateness which is what you appear to be in conflict with. Now what is the point you are attempting to make here? |
|
