Did God invent circumcision to take sexual pleasure away?

Did God invent circumcision to take sexual pleasure away? Oct 13, 2017 3:48:59 GMT

Quote

Post by Toasted Cheese on Oct 13, 2017 3:48:59 GMT

Oct 13, 2017 2:07:03 GMT rachelcarson1953 said:

Oct 12, 2017 23:18:46 GMT Toasted Cheese said:

Well, as far as I'm concerned, I don't think most really care. The doctor's aren't going to care, they profit, the rabbis are doing it in the name of God and religion, 😬, mother's shouldn't even be going down that road, since they are not male and don't have a penis, and circumcised men do not know of a life with a foreskin and a basic human right was taken away from them. The attitude of cut males can be born out of ignorance, and perhaps even being gutless and too fearful to address the hypocrisy and corrupt double standards regarding MGM. It's a vile practice. More men need to take a stance.

I am asking a question, no aggression included, simply out of ignorance:

"circumcised men do not know of a life with a foreskin and a basic human right was taken away from them. The attitude of cut males can be born out of ignorance,"

what is lost when a male is circumcised? When I was a youngster, out there experiencing sexual freedom in the 70's, no male partners (I am female) even mentioned circumcised vs. non-circumcised. Back then is wasn't an issue, so I am truly clueless about the difference.

I am against doing anything simply because a 'god' says it should be done; what are the physiological issues of the procedure?

The penis comes with a foreskin. It is there to protect the glands. It can also assist with masturbation, and also during erection and insertion, it can also assist in massaging the glands with thrust. Many uncircumcised males, also keep their foreskins retracted, giving the impression of a cut cock. Hygiene is a false argument and any male with self-awareness about himself, should know how to wash.

I am not sure where you are from, but if you lived in a region where circumcision was common practice, it would have then been considered the norm. It became common practice also in Australia and NZ after WWII, no doubt due to influence from the US medical establishment. The majority of men in the world are uncircumcised. It is more of an issue in the US and those that are Jewish and Muslim. Europeans, Central and South American and a vast majority of Asian countries keep their males intact. As for Africa, I'm sure there are more uncircumcised males here as well, however, circumcision could have been performed as a ritual into manhood by many tribes.

Females may want their sons circumcised, because they think it looks better. How creepy is that? Do they intend on f<>king their sons? Ask any uncut male if he wants to be circumcised, and I bet a massive majority of them would rather keep his foreskin. Regardless of whether or not people think it is a big deal or not, the bottom line is, the procedure is being performed without consent, especially when it is unnecessary. A male person needs to make up his own mind when he becomes sexually active. Uncut is natural and beautiful and as nature intended the male penis to be.

Just to add, most males wouldn't discuss about other men's cocks, due to the stigma of being labelled homosexual, due to the projected normalcy of our heterosexist society.