|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Oct 13, 2017 4:12:27 GMT
I am asking a question, no aggression included, simply out of ignorance: "circumcised men do not know of a life with a foreskin and a basic human right was taken away from them. The attitude of cut males can be born out of ignorance," what is lost when a male is circumcised? When I was a youngster, out there experiencing sexual freedom in the 70's, no male partners (I am female) even mentioned circumcised vs. non-circumcised. Back then is wasn't an issue, so I am truly clueless about the difference. I am against doing anything simply because a 'god' says it should be done; what are the physiological issues of the procedure?      Much ado about a lack of foreskin, actually proves that their is psychological damage incurred on many males. Females are the first to jump up and down about FGM, and unless they are born into barbaric third world Muslim countries, they get to keep their genitals intact, so where is the equality here?
|
|