Post by Kal_1993 on Oct 17, 2017 18:41:07 GMT
1. Surgical precision - a laugh worthy allegation that came from the 2nd CBI team. Nothing is surgically precise about either of the wounds'. Read the autopsy report. It's amazing how various ignorants are asserting this fact.
2. Golf Club - if you close your eyes and imagine for a moment, it's almost comical. You mean to say Aarushi and Hemraj were found having sex and this guy in a fit of rage went on to bring scalpel(why would he keep it at home?) and a golf club? Wouldn't he hit them with something around or punch the guy? If scalpel and golf club are used it should be called a planned murder , which I'm sure Talwars could plan better. Their injuries are consistent only with that of an unplanned impulsive murder.
3. Change of autopsy report - how can NAD become "prominent dilatation of vagina" after a year? This should scare the living crap out of us. Mind you, this isn't change of opinion, a change of fact. Anybody could be held guilty with tampering of autopsy reports and finger prints.
Court should ask for photographs as proofs as to why the facts been changed and have an independent inquiry.
All these were questioned by the high court. There are many more like "typographical error". I used to always want to remain an Indian citizen and now I have my doubts.
Have you forgotten innocence until proven guilty? These are the things that are used by court to convict Talwars. How can you say it got nothing to do with parents' innocence? Its not incompetence, its deliberate cooking up of evidence.
For point 2, there wasn't even any evidence of sexual contact between the servant the girl so again that idea is further proof of incompetence.
The police could be incompetent and the parents could be the killers at the same time.
If you want to use police incompetence as an excuse to caste aspersions, well it could be anyone in entire Delhi. It could even be you or me. Because of incompetence of cops they must have missed something, so every human is under the realm of possibility? What kind of argument is that? Point here is if there is no evidence, don't convict anyone. Let it remain a mystery. Don't Try to nail someone just for the sake of it.
I could pose similar questions to you to throw doubt on the parents. Why did the mother allow so many people into their daughter's bedroom to look at her defiled corpse? Was she in a state of shock or was it a ploy to destroy evidence? Why didn't the father open the terrace door even when they thought they saw blood leading upstairs? Why did they clean up so quickly?
They cleaned in the presence of police after getting permission. Opening terrace door is not father's job. Its the job of police. He didn't find the keys and hence he didnt open the door. And by the way, police told Rajesh that the killer must have gone up the stairs, couldn't the lock and escaped via another route. Police were not insistent enough as opposed to what they said later on.
How is it parents' job to secure crime scene? Don't you think they would have destroyed corpse of Hemraj elsewhere before calling the police to shift the blame on a "servant ran away", which is more believable?
No clear account of what happened on that day, especially with psychological states of people in the home.