Post by drspaceman on Oct 17, 2017 22:02:33 GMT
Have you forgotten innocence until proven guilty? These are the things that are used by court to convict Talwars. How can you say it got nothing to do with parents' innocence? Its not incompetence, its deliberate cooking up of evidence.
For point 2, there wasn't even any evidence of sexual contact between the servant the girl so again that idea is further proof of incompetence.
The police could be incompetent and the parents could be the killers at the same time.
If you want to use police incompetence as an excuse to caste aspersions, well it could be anyone in entire Delhi. It could even be you or me. Because of incompetence of cops they must have missed something, so every human is under the realm of possibility? What kind of argument is that? Point here is if there is no evidence, don't convict anyone. Let it remain a mystery. Don't Try to nail someone just for the sake of it.
I could pose similar questions to you to throw doubt on the parents. Why did the mother allow so many people into their daughter's bedroom to look at her defiled corpse? Was she in a state of shock or was it a ploy to destroy evidence? Why didn't the father open the terrace door even when they thought they saw blood leading upstairs? Why did they clean up so quickly?
They cleaned in the presence of police after getting permission. Opening terrace door is not father's job. Its the job of police. He didn't find the keys and hence he didnt open the door. And by the way, police told Rajesh that the killer must have gone up the stairs, couldn't the lock and escaped via another route. Police were not insistent enough as opposed to what they said later on.
How is it parents' job to secure crime scene? Don't you think they would have destroyed corpse of Hemraj elsewhere before calling the police to shift the blame on a "servant ran away", which is more believable?
No clear account of what happened on that day, especially with psychological states of people in the home.
Nobody is saying that they're guilty. But doubt will always exist with the case.
It's for the system to assume innocence until guilt is proven. For us, we can keep the doubt.