|
|
Post by Popeye Doyle on May 26, 2018 16:53:39 GMT
Cons - Awful way for the series to end Visual effects Superman just taking it upon himself to rid the world of nukes with no opposition from world leaders. Down a dangerous road this can lead for Superman to just enact his will on the earth.
Pros - It's in color with stereo sound It's more enjoyable, but in an ironic way, over Superman III. At 90 minutes, it's pretty brief.
|
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on May 26, 2018 17:22:56 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on May 26, 2018 18:22:41 GMT
Still one of the most baffling Superman movie moments:  |
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on May 26, 2018 18:37:54 GMT
Pros:
I haven't seen it. Though maybe I should? Looks like laughs are had with it. Or at it, rather.
|
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on May 26, 2018 18:45:10 GMT
Looks like laughs are had with it. Or at it, rather. Well it's a film from the Cannon Group. Laughs, unintentional or not, come with the territory. |
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on May 26, 2018 22:17:56 GMT
Pros - Gene Hackman is still fun to watch as Lex Luthor.
|
|
|
|
Post by James on May 27, 2018 0:31:43 GMT
Pros:
-It's enjoyably bad.
-The actors at least try.
Cons:
-Nuclear Man
-Overlong space fight scene.
-Laser vision to rebuild the great wall. Really?
-Sucks that this was the last one to star Reeve (and the rest of the original cast)
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on May 27, 2018 0:33:07 GMT
Pros: -It's enjoyably bad.-The actors at least try. Cons: -Nuclear Man -Overlong space fight scene. -Laser vision to rebuild the great wall. Really? -Sucks that this was the last one to star Reeve (and the rest of the original cast) Which is more than I can say about Superman III. |
|
|
|
Post by James on May 27, 2018 0:35:07 GMT
Pros: I haven't seen it. Though maybe I should? Looks like laughs are had with it. Or at it, rather. Well if you didn't like Superman III for its dullness, then maybe this could make up for its insane silliness to the point that it's more enjoyably bad. Still a far worse film though. |
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on May 27, 2018 0:35:32 GMT
Superman III has no laughs. And it's supposed to be a campy comedy with Richard Pryor.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on May 27, 2018 0:40:11 GMT
Pros: I haven't seen it. Though maybe I should? Looks like laughs are had with it. Or at it, rather. Well if you didn't like Superman III for its dullness, then maybe this could make up for its insane silliness to the point that it's more enjoyably bad. Still a far worse film though.I disagree. They are equally bad for different reasons. The worst crime a movie can commit is to be boring. |
|
|
|
Post by James on May 27, 2018 0:40:14 GMT
Pros: -It's enjoyably bad.-The actors at least try. Cons: -Nuclear Man -Overlong space fight scene. -Laser vision to rebuild the great wall. Really? -Sucks that this was the last one to star Reeve (and the rest of the original cast) Which is more than I can say about Superman III. Yeah but I actually didn't think III was as bad. The idea of an evil Superman had its potential even if it wasn't executed that good. Plus the no addition of Luthor made it a much more unique entry and felt fresh without him, despite him being one of the best parts of the first two films. Really, why did he need to come back in Superman II? |
|
|
|
Post by James on May 27, 2018 0:41:27 GMT
Well if you didn't like Superman III for its dullness, then maybe this could make up for its insane silliness to the point that it's more enjoyably bad. Still a far worse film though.I disagree. They are equally bad for different reasons. The worst crime a movie can commit is to be boring. See previous reply^^^ |
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on May 27, 2018 0:42:55 GMT
Which is more than I can say about Superman III. Yeah but I actually didn't think III was as bad. The idea of an evil Superman had its potential even if it wasn't executed that good. Plus the no addition of Luthor made it a much more unique entry and felt fresh without him, despite him being one of the best parts of the first two films. Really, why did he need to come back in Superman II? Except or the fact that the villain is just a lame version of Lex Luthor. The villain in Superman III is one of the most boring and redundant villains in movie history imo. I think they were on the right track giving us another superpowered villain in Superman IV. |
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on May 27, 2018 0:43:27 GMT
I disagree. They are equally bad for different reasons. The worst crime a movie can commit is to be boring. See previous reply^^^ I did. |
|
|
|
Post by James on May 27, 2018 0:45:06 GMT
Yeah but I actually didn't think III was as bad. The idea of an evil Superman had its potential even if it wasn't executed that good. Plus the no addition of Luthor made it a much more unique entry and felt fresh without him, despite him being one of the best parts of the first two films. Really, why did he need to come back in Superman II? Except or the fact that the villain is just a lame version of Lex Luthor. The villain in Superman III is one of the most boring and redundant villains in movie history imo. Richard Pryor wasn't that bad. I actually found him to be funny at times. |
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on May 27, 2018 0:47:08 GMT
Except or the fact that the villain is just a lame version of Lex Luthor. The villain in Superman III is one of the most boring and redundant villains in movie history imo. Richard Pryor wasn't that bad. I actually found him to be funny at times. He is awful and out of place imo. I much prefer Jon Cryer. |
|
|
|
Post by James on May 27, 2018 0:47:21 GMT
Superman III has no laughs. And it's supposed to be a campy comedy with Richard Pryor. I mean, I can see why one would prefer IV over III, but I can still find some more quality in III. |
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on May 27, 2018 0:47:43 GMT
Except or the fact that the villain is just a lame version of Lex Luthor. The villain in Superman III is one of the most boring and redundant villains in movie history imo. Richard Pryor wasn't that bad. I actually found him to be funny at times. I was talking about Robert Vaughn. |
|
|
|
Post by James on May 27, 2018 0:49:51 GMT
Richard Pryor wasn't that bad. I actually found him to be funny at times. I was talking about Robert Vaughn. Oh. Don't even remember him that well to be honest. |
|
