shinnickneth
Junior Member
@shinnickneth
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 1,785
|
Post by shinnickneth on May 29, 2018 0:09:50 GMT
The BDSM people? Hmmm I don't think there's anyway to know if that's true. I suppose there probably are Star Wars fans among that community. Meh. You know what I meant. Well, slave Leia on screen did awaken the sexuality in many 11/12 year old boys so...sex and Star Wars can go together.
|
|
|
Post by merh on May 30, 2018 1:20:10 GMT
I've been seeing this a lot in the YouTube comments. I don't see how that's insulting. Soy bean. Tofu. Manly men eat meat. Girly men eat Tofu & drink Soy milk. Or so the insult started awhile back.
|
|
|
Post by merh on May 30, 2018 1:25:57 GMT
Lol, okay. Are these the same gents who popularized the word "cuck"? No. "Cuck" is the short form for "cuckold", which originated as a word in the 12th century. A "cuck" is a male who is believed to be incapable of satisfying his wife/girlfriend/husband/boyfriend/partner. The unsatisfied partner then cheats on the other by inviting someone else into bed to "properly fuck" him/her. Sometimes the unmanly "cuck" watches as his lover has sex with the stranger who is the only one able to "properly" take care of his/her needs. The whole cuckold thing has become very popular among the BSDM people in the last 10 years. So when someone calls someone else a "cuck", that person is trying emasculate the other. Anyway...there you go. A little more than that In books I've read (was it in Poldark? Read that in the 70s) it wasnt anything to do with pleasing their women. A man could sleep around, but the wife had to be faithful or it was shameful to the man that his woman would look elsewhere. It was as much about him owning her & keeping her in her place that she wouldnt dare cheat on him out of fear of what he would do to her-the beating she would receive. So a cuck cant put his woman in her place. Might even let her "wear the pants" as they used to say or even be henpecked
|
|
shinnickneth
Junior Member
@shinnickneth
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 1,785
|
Post by shinnickneth on May 30, 2018 2:24:24 GMT
A little more than that In books I've read (was it in Poldark? Read that in the 70s) it wasnt anything to do with pleasing their women. A man could sleep around, but the wife had to be faithful or it was shameful to the man that his woman would look elsewhere. It was as much about him owning her & keeping her in her place that she wouldnt dare cheat on him out of fear of what he would do to her-the beating she would receive. So a cuck cant put his woman in her place. Might even let her "wear the pants" as they used to say or even be henpeckedYes, basically a cuck isn't "the man" in the relationship. He's been emasculated. Not being able to please his partner, is just part of the whole emasculation.
|
|