Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2018 5:54:59 GMT
Footage has leaked!
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Nov 26, 2018 5:57:43 GMT
Footage has leaked! CAM-POW!
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Nov 26, 2018 18:39:39 GMT
The way to go would be the female Thor. I wouldn't necessarily mind a Beta Ray Bill movie, but only after they introduced him in a proper Thor movie. Whereas female Thor wouldn't need that: Either they can use- Natalie Portman as Jane Foster which is what they did in the comics, OR Sif or Valkyrie whom have already been introduced in the movies. OR (my option) a totally new person and have her take up the mantle of Thor while actual THor Odinson goes off to rebuild Asgard. This lovely lady is Brooke Ence. I've posted about her before. I didn't make this art/meme so someone else must agree with me. She played bit parts as an amazon in Wonder Woman and Justice League.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Nov 26, 2018 21:11:44 GMT
The way to go would be the female Thor. I wouldn't necessarily mind a Beta Ray Bill movie, but only after they introduced him in a proper Thor movie. Whereas female Thor wouldn't need that: Either they can use- Natalie Portman as Jane Foster which is what they did in the comics, OR Sif or Valkyrie whom have already been introduced in the movies. OR (my option) a totally new person and have her take up the mantle of Thor while actual THor Odinson goes off to rebuild Asgard. This lovely lady is Brooke Ence. I've posted about her before. I didn't make this art/meme so someone else must agree with me. She played bit parts as an amazon in Wonder Woman and Justice League. Brooke Ence is a professional athlete though, not an actor. I mean, nothing against the lady, she clearly looks the part... I just don't think she has the acting skills to be a lead in a movie. The best bet is simply to give Sif the mantle of Thor. Barring her, give it to Jane or Valkyrie.
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Nov 26, 2018 21:39:56 GMT
The way to go would be the female Thor. I wouldn't necessarily mind a Beta Ray Bill movie, but only after they introduced him in a proper Thor movie. Whereas female Thor wouldn't need that: Either they can use- Natalie Portman as Jane Foster which is what they did in the comics, OR Sif or Valkyrie whom have already been introduced in the movies. OR (my option) a totally new person and have her take up the mantle of Thor while actual THor Odinson goes off to rebuild Asgard. This lovely lady is Brooke Ence. I've posted about her before. I didn't make this art/meme so someone else must agree with me. She played bit parts as an amazon in Wonder Woman and Justice League. Brooke Ence is a professional athlete though, not an actor. I mean, nothing against the lady, she clearly looks the part... I just don't think she has the acting skills to be a lead in a movie. The best bet is simply to give Sif the mantle of Thor. Barring her, give it to Jane or Valkyrie. Welllll, we don't know that she cant act, and acting lessons are a thing. She's clearly comfortable in front of the camera, very photogenic and very personable (Wonder Woman, Justice League, tons of youtube videos and photography). These are all half the battle when casting super hero roles.
If I were the director I would be more willing to take a chance on someone like this and use my talents to get a performance out of her, than to put up with an expensive movie star. The fact that its an MCU movie will sell itself. I'd even sell her to the producers that way: "Fellas, she comes cheap comparatively speaking! And we'd be responsible for making a star!"
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Nov 26, 2018 22:11:01 GMT
Brooke Ence is a professional athlete though, not an actor. I mean, nothing against the lady, she clearly looks the part... I just don't think she has the acting skills to be a lead in a movie. The best bet is simply to give Sif the mantle of Thor. Barring her, give it to Jane or Valkyrie. Welllll, we don't know that she cant act, and acting lessons are a thing. She's clearly comfortable in front of the camera, very photogenic and very personable (Wonder Woman, Justice League, tons of youtube videos and photography). These are all half the battle when casting super hero roles.
If I were the director I would be more willing to take a chance on someone like this and use my talents to get a performance out of her, than to put up with an expensive movie star. The fact that its an MCU movie will sell itself. I'd even sell her to the producers that way: "Fellas, she comes cheap comparatively speaking! And we'd be responsible for making a star!"
Errmmm... acting lessons are great and all but decent acting isn't exactly stuff you can learn in just a few months or even a year or two. You'll practically be asking the director to take a chance on an unknown person, without having them win an audition, all on the chance that they might hopefully develop enough acting abilities by the time shooting starts to carry lead in a movie. That's the kind of disaster that C-grade action films in the 80's were known for. Being comfortable in front of a camera isn't a sure indication that someone had lead-actor material. Majority of WWE superstars and Victoria Secret models are comfortable in front of cameras, doesn't mean they're good actors. The best thing to do is hold auditions, invite her to audition, and only pick her if she wins the role fair and square.
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Nov 27, 2018 6:42:49 GMT
Welllll, we don't know that she cant act, and acting lessons are a thing. She's clearly comfortable in front of the camera, very photogenic and very personable (Wonder Woman, Justice League, tons of youtube videos and photography). These are all half the battle when casting super hero roles.
If I were the director I would be more willing to take a chance on someone like this and use my talents to get a performance out of her, than to put up with an expensive movie star. The fact that its an MCU movie will sell itself. I'd even sell her to the producers that way: "Fellas, she comes cheap comparatively speaking! And we'd be responsible for making a star!"
Errmmm... acting lessons are great and all but decent acting isn't exactly stuff you can learn in just a few months or even a year or two. You'll practically be asking the director to take a chance on an unknown person, without having them win an audition, all on the chance that they might hopefully develop enough acting abilities by the time shooting starts to carry lead in a movie. That's the kind of disaster that C-grade action films in the 80's were known for. Being comfortable in front of a camera isn't a sure indication that someone had lead-actor material. Majority of WWE superstars and Victoria Secret models are comfortable in front of cameras, doesn't mean they're good actors. The best thing to do is hold auditions, invite her to audition, and only pick her if she wins the role fair and square. Believe me, I understand what you're saying, but similar stories have happened and turned out alright. I don't think Henry Cavill and Gal Gadot are much in the acting department and they're better casting than some of the known stars have turned out in similar roles.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Nov 27, 2018 6:51:02 GMT
Errmmm... acting lessons are great and all but decent acting isn't exactly stuff you can learn in just a few months or even a year or two. You'll practically be asking the director to take a chance on an unknown person, without having them win an audition, all on the chance that they might hopefully develop enough acting abilities by the time shooting starts to carry lead in a movie. That's the kind of disaster that C-grade action films in the 80's were known for. Being comfortable in front of a camera isn't a sure indication that someone had lead-actor material. Majority of WWE superstars and Victoria Secret models are comfortable in front of cameras, doesn't mean they're good actors. The best thing to do is hold auditions, invite her to audition, and only pick her if she wins the role fair and square. Believe me, I understand what you're saying, but similar stories have happened and turned out alright. I don't think Henry Cavill and Gal Gadot are much in the acting department and they're better casting than some of the known stars have turned out in similar roles. Gadot and Cavill's stories are not similar to this lady. Gadot already had a number of minor and major roles in her belt before she landed the lead for WW. Cavill had been acting since he wad a kid and had already played lead in a few shows/movies before becoming Superman. This lady has almost zero acting experience other than putting on an Amazon costume and looking tough. I have nothing against her, but if you're replacing a tentpole character like Thor you probably want to make sure you get someone who can handle being lead.
|
|
|
Post by HorrorMetal on Nov 29, 2018 16:56:22 GMT
I was really hoping he would be in Ragnarok.
|
|