|
Post by summers8 on Aug 8, 2018 6:08:40 GMT
The Batman movie series quite literally dumbed itself down for kids after Batman Returns. They went so far with it that Batman and Robin was practically a toy commercial. yes they did and paid the price , learned and came back with Batman Begins.
funny Batman and Robin was indeed a toy commercial and critics criticised, so why do they protecting the MCU movies that are also nothing more but toy commercials...worse, disney toy commercials.
did you see this
And the rest of their movies. all mcu movies are toy commercials with little story telling same as batman and robin
|
|
mog1138
Freshman
@mog1138
Posts: 55
Likes: 20
|
Post by mog1138 on Aug 8, 2018 7:26:05 GMT
Funny they felt the need to give Kitty magic time travelling hands. HUGE disgrace to the X-Men comics. I hope that Tim Miller Kitty movie somehow sees the time of day at Marvel Studios. I'd be okay with an Excalibur movie though. Also I like Thor Ragnarok because of this guy more than Marvel And reason it is called adaption.
they gave kitty time travel powers as a tribute to the comics because in the real comics she is the one that goes back and because in the movie she was not born in 1970s, it made sense logan goes but somehow still give kitty an important role in the movies. by being the one who sends logan back. but the time travel element is still there and it uses the comics way of doing it. sending back a person's consciousness. which in the comics showed the genius of the writing than the typical use of time machine.
the change worked adapting the story to film, most importantly the movie got the content and theme of the comics right, which was what matters the most. a dystopian drama character driven dark movie of luck and hope.Um, let's look at mcu, who created ultron? who was spiderman's best friend, why is GOTG A comedy and not like star gate as the comics are? Why was Thor 3 not like LOTR or Game of Thrones, was the Manderian not an actual terrorist in the comics?
this is where MCU fails. every comic movie changes stuff (xmen, dc, mcu) but what MCU does is change the content of the comics to dumb it down for disney kids and the dumb masses and make it more fun. that is not the change xmen or batman usually makes. there is a big difference.
I mostly wanted to see how you’d react. I think changes made to the source material to make it work as a movie is fine if the end result is enjoyable. I could understand Ultron or Thor or Mandarin pissing off the comic diehards. But some of those things...? -What’s wrong with Ned Leeds as PP’s friend? They just reworked Miles Morales friend Ganke, right down to the ethnicity to give Peter a young confidant friend. I think it works. -GotG is a straight up adaptation of the Abnett and Lanning run. Well aside from dance-off and lack of Cosmo. Not sure where the heck you’re getting Stargate from. They certainly went NUTS with Baby Groot toys for GotG2 though.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Aug 8, 2018 15:29:06 GMT
funny Batman and Robin was indeed a toy commercial and critics criticised, so why do they protecting the MCU movies that are also nothing more but toy commercials...worse, disney toy commercials. Because those scenes were done for comedic purposes. Batman and Robin was just filmed that way throughout the whole thing.
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Aug 8, 2018 20:52:51 GMT
It was all on you, huh? Well then, seems like you dropped the ball.
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Aug 8, 2018 20:59:14 GMT
Rip Marvel.Saying that with your avatar makes you look like a total moron.
|
|