Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2017 1:23:08 GMT
Do you identify as any of these terms?
I got the first topic on the board!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2017 3:20:20 GMT
I don't like the term "gay" as it seems to have cultural connotations, with which I don't identify. I'm homosexual, going on asexual.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2017 4:25:19 GMT
I don't like the term "gay" as it seems to have cultural connotations, with which I don't identify. I'm homosexual, going on asexual. Yes, "gay" just refers to a particular subculture of homosexuals. Not all homosexuals are "gay". Take a guy in prison for example who takes on a male lover. I'm sure he won't be listening to Lady Gaga anytime soon. Actually, homosexual is just a sex act. It shouldn't be an identity. I wouldn't say that a prisoner who rapes or has consensual sex with another male prisoner because his choice is limited is homosexual, or even necessarily bisexual. You're only homosexual if you have a choice of either a male or female lover, and you would prefer a male lover. "Homosexual is just a sex act" seems a lot like the rhetoric that homophobic Christians use to justify denying the rights of homosexuals. |
|
|
|
Post by darkpast on Mar 19, 2017 5:43:52 GMT
NO
|
|
bd74
Junior Member
#WalkAway
@bd74
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 659
|
Post by bd74 on Mar 19, 2017 17:45:59 GMT
I wouldn't say that a prisoner who rapes or has consensual sex with another male prisoner because his choice is limited is homosexual, or even necessarily bisexual. You're only homosexual if you have a choice of either a male or female lover, and you would prefer a male lover. "Homosexual is just a sex act" seems a lot like the rhetoric that homophobic Christians use to justify denying the rights of homosexuals. I agree with this whole post. And there are many examples and instances of situational sex that have no bearing on a person's sexual orientation. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2017 18:14:00 GMT
Lesbian.  May I forever kneel before the altar of the feminine. |
|
|
|
Post by TutuAnimationPrincess on Mar 19, 2017 22:48:10 GMT
I identify as Julia, but I also happen to be a lesbian for what it's worth. 😉
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2017 5:19:13 GMT
I must be a lesbian because I love pussy
|
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Mar 21, 2017 7:58:04 GMT
Im straight.
|
|
sov
Sophomore
@sov
Posts: 143
Likes: 45
|
Post by sov on Mar 22, 2017 1:34:25 GMT
I dunno -- I don't really care about gender. I discovered a long time ago that what someone has between their legs is not a determining factor as to whether I'll be attracted to or have romantic feelings toward them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 22, 2017 19:49:36 GMT
No, I am none of those.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2017 10:37:53 GMT
I am Bi but I lead more towards being a lesbian 'cause I have always been more attracted to women and don't have any plans to going back to dating guys if I broke up with my Wifey.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2017 17:21:53 GMT
I dunno -- I don't really care about gender. I discovered a long time ago that what someone has between their legs is not a determining factor as to whether I'll be attracted to or have romantic feelings toward them.  |
|
|
|
Post by pennypacker on Mar 28, 2017 2:42:58 GMT
I dunno -- I don't really care about gender. I discovered a long time ago that what someone has between their legs is not a determining factor as to whether I'll be attracted to or have romantic feelings toward them. I believe they call that pansexuality. |
|
sov
Sophomore
@sov
Posts: 143
Likes: 45
|
Post by sov on Mar 28, 2017 4:19:08 GMT
I dunno -- I don't really care about gender. I discovered a long time ago that what someone has between their legs is not a determining factor as to whether I'll be attracted to or have romantic feelings toward them. I believe they call that pansexuality. Ah, thank you. |
|
|
|
Post by Nostalgias4Geeks🌈 on Mar 28, 2017 5:21:54 GMT
I dunno -- I don't really care about gender. I discovered a long time ago that what someone has between their legs is not a determining factor as to whether I'll be attracted to or have romantic feelings toward them. I believe they call that pansexuality. Weird. I thought that was when you were attracted to kitchen appliances like pans. Guess I was way off.  |
|
|
|
Post by pennypacker on Mar 28, 2017 5:23:45 GMT
I believe they call that pansexuality. Weird. I thought that was when you were attracted to kitchen appliances like pans. Guess I was way off. I think those are potheads! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2017 13:12:52 GMT
I don't like the term "gay" as it seems to have cultural connotations, with which I don't identify. I'm homosexual, going on asexual.Is that because no-one wants you, or you are just not confident within yourself or interested in sex? I don't believe anyone is asexual. That is just a cop-out. I acknowledged that I'm homosexual, but have little interest in sex; hence " going on asexual". Much uglier people than myself regularly have sex; but I'm happy to acknowledge that I experience barriers to getting involved in a romantic relationship. I could probably have sex without paying for it by the weekend if I actually set my mind to it, but I have no interest in doing so. I do believe that I would have little interest in it even were it freely accessible from a partner, as has been my past experience. And the fact that you don't believe that it is possible for a human to be asexual is just ignorance. The human sex-drive is variable in strength from one individual to the next, so why can it not be possible for an individual to have no sex drive at all? This seems to be along the lines of "I don't like it, therefore it doesn't exist". |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2017 21:39:57 GMT
I acknowledged that I'm homosexual, but have little interest in sex; hence " going on asexual". Much uglier people than myself regularly have sex; but I'm happy to acknowledge that I experience barriers to getting involved in a romantic relationship. I could probably have sex without paying for it by the weekend if I actually set my mind to it, but I have no interest in doing so. I do believe that I would have little interest in it even were it freely accessible from a partner, as has been my past experience. And the fact that you don't believe that it is possible for a human to be asexual is just ignorance. The human sex-drive is variable in strength from one individual to the next, so why can it not be possible for an individual to have no sex drive at all? This seems to be along the lines of "I don't like it, therefore it doesn't exist". I think "asexual", is more along the lines of just abstinence. The desires are still there. Some people's sex drive might be stronger the next, but there are way too many labels and tags for sexuality today and it is getting out of hand. People just want to appear cool or trendy. Yes, very narcissistic. I don't care whether other's want to f<>k or not, I just believe in "asexuality" as being a misnomer. Abstinence is a different matter from asexuality, because that's a behaviour and a lifestyle choice. Asexuality is basically not having the desire to have sex. Since I am sexually aroused by men, that would make me homosexual. But lack of companionship is what bothers me; not the fact that I don't have someone to attend to my sexual urges. I think that I would easily be able to accept a romantic relationship where there was no penetrative sex involved. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2017 21:58:34 GMT
Abstinence is a different matter from asexuality, because that's a behaviour and a lifestyle choice. Asexuality is basically not having the desire to have sex. Since I am sexually aroused by men, that would make me homosexual. But lack of companionship is what bothers me; not the fact that I don't have someone to attend to my sexual urges. I think that I would easily be able to accept a romantic relationship where there was no penetrative sex involved. Since you are sexually aroused by men, then you still have sexual desires. That does not make you asexual. It is also your body mic. You need to make up the rules for it and what you do and don't want. That needs to be respected by your partner. If somebody doesn't want to be with you, it shouldn't be because you don't want penetrative sex. That is not necessary and is not what "sex" comprises of. That might just be more along the lines of base f<>king. I didn't say that I was asexual (which is evident if you read my first post); but I'm closer to that point on the sexuality spectrum than most people are. |
|
