|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Mar 28, 2017 12:40:02 GMT
Well done. I actually hate the term LGBT. I don't even like the word "gay", it makes it sound as if we run around with a silly smile on our face 24/7. Queer is the term used now by most politically aware homosexuals. And I personally don't object to the word homosexual either. Or you can call me Mr. Homo. Queer meaning strange and unusual, can sound insulting and derogatory. Gay is ok, but I would also like to think gamey, that you go around with a silly little smile on your queer homo face.  I don't mind the term homo at all and I can just as easily throw back het or breeder, back at boring and straight morons. |
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Mar 28, 2017 12:41:38 GMT
I don't like the term "gay" as it seems to have cultural connotations, with which I don't identify. I'm homosexual, going on asexual.Is that because no-one wants you, or you are just not confident within yourself or interested in sex? I don't believe anyone is asexual. That is just a cop-out. |
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Mar 28, 2017 12:51:44 GMT
I wouldn't say that a prisoner who rapes or has consensual sex with another male prisoner because his choice is limited is homosexual, or even necessarily bisexual. You're only homosexual if you have a choice of either a male or female lover, and you would prefer a male lover. "Homosexual is just a sex act" seems a lot like the rhetoric that homophobic Christians use to justify denying the rights of homosexuals. I agree with this whole post. And there are many examples and instances of situational sex that have no bearing on a person's sexual orientation.Are you gay? A person who is willing to perform a sex act with the same gender has tapped into their homosexual tendencies and want to do it. If they also screw women, they are then "bisexual". Bluto in prison may not be attractive enough anyway, and has to rape and force his way onto another dude. This could be about power and control, but ultimately, if he is going to rape another guy, he could just as easily do it with another guy on the outside. Most of these guys are dense anyway and are just following a social conditioning of what is "perceived" as normal and that is heterosexuality. If it is easier for them to live life f<>king females, then that is what they will do. If a gay guy was in a long term situation with just women around, would he want to f<>k them? I sure as hell wouldn't and can't. If he does, then he is "bisexual". It's simple! The same can also be said then about men around men. If they want to f<>k another man, it's because they want to and are attracted to it sexually. One cannot really fuck with out sexual desire and arousal. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2017 13:12:52 GMT
I don't like the term "gay" as it seems to have cultural connotations, with which I don't identify. I'm homosexual, going on asexual.Is that because no-one wants you, or you are just not confident within yourself or interested in sex? I don't believe anyone is asexual. That is just a cop-out. I acknowledged that I'm homosexual, but have little interest in sex; hence " going on asexual". Much uglier people than myself regularly have sex; but I'm happy to acknowledge that I experience barriers to getting involved in a romantic relationship. I could probably have sex without paying for it by the weekend if I actually set my mind to it, but I have no interest in doing so. I do believe that I would have little interest in it even were it freely accessible from a partner, as has been my past experience. And the fact that you don't believe that it is possible for a human to be asexual is just ignorance. The human sex-drive is variable in strength from one individual to the next, so why can it not be possible for an individual to have no sex drive at all? This seems to be along the lines of "I don't like it, therefore it doesn't exist". |
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Mar 28, 2017 21:34:40 GMT
Is that because no-one wants you, or you are just not confident within yourself or interested in sex? I don't believe anyone is asexual. That is just a cop-out. I acknowledged that I'm homosexual, but have little interest in sex; hence " going on asexual". Much uglier people than myself regularly have sex; but I'm happy to acknowledge that I experience barriers to getting involved in a romantic relationship. I could probably have sex without paying for it by the weekend if I actually set my mind to it, but I have no interest in doing so. I do believe that I would have little interest in it even were it freely accessible from a partner, as has been my past experience. And the fact that you don't believe that it is possible for a human to be asexual is just ignorance. The human sex-drive is variable in strength from one individual to the next, so why can it not be possible for an individual to have no sex drive at all? This seems to be along the lines of "I don't like it, therefore it doesn't exist". I think "asexual", is more along the lines of just abstinence. The desires are still there. Some people's sex drive might be stronger the next, but there are way too many labels and tags for sexuality today and it is getting out of hand. People just want to appear cool or trendy. Yes, very narcissistic. I don't care whether other's want to f<>k or not, I just believe in "asexuality" as being a misnomer. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2017 21:39:57 GMT
I acknowledged that I'm homosexual, but have little interest in sex; hence " going on asexual". Much uglier people than myself regularly have sex; but I'm happy to acknowledge that I experience barriers to getting involved in a romantic relationship. I could probably have sex without paying for it by the weekend if I actually set my mind to it, but I have no interest in doing so. I do believe that I would have little interest in it even were it freely accessible from a partner, as has been my past experience. And the fact that you don't believe that it is possible for a human to be asexual is just ignorance. The human sex-drive is variable in strength from one individual to the next, so why can it not be possible for an individual to have no sex drive at all? This seems to be along the lines of "I don't like it, therefore it doesn't exist". I think "asexual", is more along the lines of just abstinence. The desires are still there. Some people's sex drive might be stronger the next, but there are way too many labels and tags for sexuality today and it is getting out of hand. People just want to appear cool or trendy. Yes, very narcissistic. I don't care whether other's want to f<>k or not, I just believe in "asexuality" as being a misnomer. Abstinence is a different matter from asexuality, because that's a behaviour and a lifestyle choice. Asexuality is basically not having the desire to have sex. Since I am sexually aroused by men, that would make me homosexual. But lack of companionship is what bothers me; not the fact that I don't have someone to attend to my sexual urges. I think that I would easily be able to accept a romantic relationship where there was no penetrative sex involved. |
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Mar 28, 2017 21:53:59 GMT
I think "asexual", is more along the lines of just abstinence. The desires are still there. Some people's sex drive might be stronger the next, but there are way too many labels and tags for sexuality today and it is getting out of hand. People just want to appear cool or trendy. Yes, very narcissistic. I don't care whether other's want to f<>k or not, I just believe in "asexuality" as being a misnomer. Abstinence is a different matter from asexuality, because that's a behaviour and a lifestyle choice. Asexuality is basically not having the desire to have sex. Since I am sexually aroused by men, that would make me homosexual. But lack of companionship is what bothers me; not the fact that I don't have someone to attend to my sexual urges. I think that I would easily be able to accept a romantic relationship where there was no penetrative sex involved. Since you are sexually aroused by men, then you still have sexual desires. That does not make you asexual. It is also your body mic. You need to make up the rules for it and what you do and don't want. That needs to be respected by your partner. If somebody doesn't want to be with you, it shouldn't be because you don't want penetrative sex. That is not necessary and is not what "sex" comprises of. That might just be more along the lines of base f<>king. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2017 21:58:34 GMT
Abstinence is a different matter from asexuality, because that's a behaviour and a lifestyle choice. Asexuality is basically not having the desire to have sex. Since I am sexually aroused by men, that would make me homosexual. But lack of companionship is what bothers me; not the fact that I don't have someone to attend to my sexual urges. I think that I would easily be able to accept a romantic relationship where there was no penetrative sex involved. Since you are sexually aroused by men, then you still have sexual desires. That does not make you asexual. It is also your body mic. You need to make up the rules for it and what you do and don't want. That needs to be respected by your partner. If somebody doesn't want to be with you, it shouldn't be because you don't want penetrative sex. That is not necessary and is not what "sex" comprises of. That might just be more along the lines of base f<>king. I didn't say that I was asexual (which is evident if you read my first post); but I'm closer to that point on the sexuality spectrum than most people are. |
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Mar 28, 2017 22:06:05 GMT
Since you are sexually aroused by men, then you still have sexual desires. That does not make you asexual. It is also your body mic. You need to make up the rules for it and what you do and don't want. That needs to be respected by your partner. If somebody doesn't want to be with you, it shouldn't be because you don't want penetrative sex. That is not necessary and is not what "sex" comprises of. That might just be more along the lines of base f<>king. I didn't say that I was asexual (which is evident if you read my first post); but I'm closer to that point on the sexuality spectrum than most people are. My main point was that I do not believe in "asexuality" being much of a valid sexuality and is just a throwaway. What you believe yourself to be, or steering towards is your own right to label yourself with whatever you identify as. I just cared to give out my opinion on it being a chat forum. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2017 22:12:21 GMT
I didn't say that I was asexual (which is evident if you read my first post); but I'm closer to that point on the sexuality spectrum than most people are. My main point was that I do not believe in "asexuality" being much of a valid sexuality and is just a throwaway. What you believe yourself to be, or steering towards is your own right to label yourself with whatever you identify as. I just cared to give out my opinion on it being a chat forum. Asexuality isn't a sexuality; it's a lack of sexuality. And if there are people who are barely interested in sex at all, I can certainly believe that there are those who have no interest in sex. It would be very surprising if there were some kind of natural law that determined that everyone must have a sexual orientation. |
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Mar 28, 2017 22:20:05 GMT
My main point was that I do not believe in "asexuality" being much of a valid sexuality and is just a throwaway. What you believe yourself to be, or steering towards is your own right to label yourself with whatever you identify as. I just cared to give out my opinion on it being a chat forum. Asexuality isn't a sexuality; it's a lack of sexuality. And if there are people who are barely interested in sex at all, I can certainly believe that there are those who have no interest in sex. It would be very surprising if there were some kind of natural law that determined that everyone must have a sexual orientation. It just might be too much trouble for some, or not feeling confident or secure in one's self. Looks are also a big factor. Age is also a issue which would affect sex drive. I can't speak for females, but for males, I don't believe any guy would be born asexual, unless he had some abnormality with his genitals. |
|
|
|
Post by General Kenobi on May 30, 2017 0:18:30 GMT
I'm bisexual and a furry. For what it's worth.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Jun 10, 2017 0:22:23 GMT
Bisexual
|
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Jun 11, 2017 6:22:32 GMT
im part tomato actually and eggplant as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jul 17, 2017 12:35:05 GMT
Lesbian.  May I forever kneel before the altar of the feminine. Wouldn't you rather be a nice gay boy in your next life Jacky? |
|
