|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jul 19, 2018 14:57:30 GMT
You just don't like the answers and responses you are getting, they don't make you look good. But you still haven't given any answers Cheese. You've just blustered, and been rude. QED. You still haven't refuted the video clip. Why is that? |
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Jul 19, 2018 15:07:42 GMT
But you still haven't given any answers Cheese. You've just blustered, and been rude. QED. You still haven't refuted the video clip. Why is that? Because you haven't been able to provide an executive summary. Also why should I bother to oblige when you can't be bother to make a serious answer to a civil question, one pertinent to the whole exchange? You still have that answer outstanding on this thread. Remember?
|
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Jul 19, 2018 17:31:22 GMT
Coming from you, that's not really a surprising statement. I disagree with it. Hitler made a mess out of Germany. Socially and economically, Germany was worse of after Hitler's reign than before. Right but by your own logic his policies were brilliant, they were really popular. In the long run, they weren't. |
|
|
|
Post by Lugh on Jul 19, 2018 18:24:12 GMT
Right but by your own logic his policies were brilliant, they were really popular. In the long run, they weren't. So? You never specified that before. Either way if they were he would be a great leader. Anybody who thinks if things were different Hitler would be a good leader is demented. |
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Jul 19, 2018 20:29:35 GMT
In the long run, they weren't. So? You never specified that before. Either way if they were he would be a great leader. Exactly. If humanity had evolved to fascism, and human beings thrived best in fascistic societies, then Hitler would have been a great leader. The reason he wasn't is that humans have not evolved to become Borg drones. |
|
|
|
Post by Lugh on Jul 19, 2018 20:30:57 GMT
So? You never specified that before. Either way if they were he would be a great leader. Exactly. If humanity had evolved to fascism, and human beings thrived best in fascistic societies, then Hitler would have been a great leader. The reason he wasn't is that humans have not evolved to become Borg drones. You've just completely reverted on your past stance. |
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jul 19, 2018 23:12:12 GMT
You still haven't refuted the video clip. Why is that? Because you haven't been able to provide an executive summary. Also why should I bother to oblige when you can't be bother to make a serious answer to a civil question, one pertinent to the whole exchange? You still have that answer outstanding on this thread. Remember?
You don't need an executive summary. This is just part of your smug games and avoidance. It's right there for you in the clip. It's not a f<>king boardroom meeting on morals and ethics and the law. |
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Jul 20, 2018 6:36:57 GMT
But you still haven't given any answers Cheese. You've just blustered, and been rude. QED. You still haven't refuted the video clip. Why is that? First, there is no video clip in this thread. Second, if no written transcript or neutral summary exists, any video is questionable on an informational level. |
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Jul 20, 2018 6:42:22 GMT
Exactly. If humanity had evolved to fascism, and human beings thrived best in fascistic societies, then Hitler would have been a great leader. The reason he wasn't is that humans have not evolved to become Borg drones. You've just completely reverted on your past stance. You are welcome to show me how and where. But given your difficult relationship with reality (exhibited in another thread), I doubt you'll be able to. |
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Jul 20, 2018 9:29:14 GMT
You still haven't refuted the video clip. Why is that? First, there is no video clip in this thread. Second, if no written transcript or neutral summary exists, any video is questionable on an informational level. And with that, Cheese is toast. |
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jul 20, 2018 10:08:35 GMT
You still haven't refuted the video clip. Why is that? First, there is no video clip in this thread. Second, if no written transcript or neutral summary exists, any video is questionable on an informational level. I was referring to the other thread, regarding Flans own comments.
Information can be given through many facets. You either connect with something or not. If you want to be dismissive of something, just because you want to be inflexible and pretentious about something, you might miss out on some extraordinary sunshine, sunshine! Now what is the point you are attempting to make.  |
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jul 20, 2018 10:09:37 GMT
First, there is no video clip in this thread. Second, if no written transcript or neutral summary exists, any video is questionable on an informational level. And with that, Cheese is toast. At least I'm not a wooden headed deluded liar. Does your nose grow often Pinocchio? |
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Jul 20, 2018 10:19:05 GMT
And with that, Cheese is toast. At least I'm not a wooden headed deluded liar. Does your nose grow often Pinocchio? If that is what you believe in your head. Sure, convincing oneself of being the true one feels good. But as it stands you are the only one who believes in your claims regarding other posters motives and intents. |
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Jul 20, 2018 10:19:17 GMT
Information can be given through many facets. You either connect with something or not. If you want to be dismissive of something, just because you want to be inflexible and pretentious about something, you might miss out on some extraordinary sunshine, sunshine! Translation: You believe what you want to believe, and don't want to put intellectual effort in it; like the effort to read and think, instead of zoning out in front of moving images. Nothing wrong with it per se, but don't expect anyone to take you seriously, if you believe a video presents evidence for anything. |
|
|
|
Post by Lugh on Jul 20, 2018 10:30:09 GMT
You've just completely reverted on your past stance. You are welcome to show me how and where. But given your difficult relationship with reality (exhibited in another thread), I doubt you'll be able to. Someother lad: Does the fact that the masses regard something as "the right thing" make it the right thing? You: If by "masses" you mean the absolute majority of the population, then yes. Whether or not you personally think fascism has been disastrous is irrelevant to what is good or bad. It's the evaluation of the masses that decides per what you say above. |
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Jul 20, 2018 10:31:44 GMT
And with that, Cheese is toast. At least I'm not a wooden headed deluded liar. Does your nose grow often Pinocchio? Nope, still don't see any arguments in such replies to me, sorry. |
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jul 20, 2018 20:51:18 GMT
At least I'm not a wooden headed deluded liar. Does your nose grow often Pinocchio? If that is what you believe in your head. Sure, convincing oneself of being the true one feels good. But as it stands you are the only one who believes in your claims regarding other posters motives and intents. Perhaps because I am not one of the sheep. Can't help you with your own limitations son. |
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jul 20, 2018 20:52:37 GMT
At least I'm not a wooden headed deluded liar. Does your nose grow often Pinocchio? Nope, still don't see any arguments in such replies to me, sorry. We will see what we want too. Some may refuse to see, due to their wooden heads. Somethings can't be refuted, so the argument won't even exist, only in your head. |
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jul 20, 2018 21:03:58 GMT
Information can be given through many facets. You either connect with something or not. If you want to be dismissive of something, just because you want to be inflexible and pretentious about something, you might miss out on some extraordinary sunshine, sunshine! Translation: You believe what you want to believe, and don't want to put intellectual effort in it; like the effort to read and think, instead of zoning out in front of moving images. Nothing wrong with it per se, but don't expect anyone to take you seriously, if you believe a video presents evidence for anything. Who said I had expectations or even care how others take me? I may not take what you say seriously and a few posters on a single chat thread does not equate to any voice of reason. Our truth is our own, it is neither right nor wrong, but something will either connect or not. It's important to be flexible and open-minded, but I won't buy into other's delusions either. |
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Jul 20, 2018 22:24:08 GMT
If that is what you believe in your head. Sure, convincing oneself of being the true one feels good. But as it stands you are the only one who believes in your claims regarding other posters motives and intents. Perhaps because I am not one of the sheep. Can't help you with your own limitations son. I understand your need to tell yourself you are different, toasty. |
|
