|
Post by darkpast on Jul 8, 2018 5:35:41 GMT
Why does anyone think that?
|
|
|
Post by Nicko's Nose on Jul 8, 2018 5:40:03 GMT
Good question.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jul 8, 2018 6:02:58 GMT
It's shorter.
|
|
|
Post by darkpast on Jul 8, 2018 6:13:53 GMT
it was less ambitious than BvS. being shorter is not better
|
|
|
Post by hobowar on Jul 8, 2018 7:46:45 GMT
It's shorter. There's no Martha or Knightmare scene. The plot kinda made sense. There's no Lex Luther. Batman and Superman don't act like psychopathic retards. personally, I think Joss did the best job anyone could to salvage a movie that Snyder had already fucked beyond repair.
#ReleasetheWhedoncut
|
|
|
Post by hobowar on Jul 8, 2018 7:48:14 GMT
This is why Fant4stic is better than the whole DCEU except Wonder Woman.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Jul 8, 2018 8:07:51 GMT
I thought it was better in some ways and worse in other ways. They both have the exact same IMDb score so they're about the same.
The CGI, the action and the story were better in Batman vs Superman. Whereas Justice League (aside from the CGI) didn't do anything as particularly wrong, there was no "Save Martha" scene, no villain as bad as Lex Luthor and it wasn't quite as depressing, Superman was portrayed much better....though Batman much worse.
They're both about the same.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2018 11:26:15 GMT
I think they both where pretty equal when in comes to quality.
Also who cares if someone thinks is better.
|
|
|
Post by hobowar on Jul 8, 2018 12:25:28 GMT
it was less ambitious than BvS. being shorter is not better Like MovieBob said, "It doesn't try hard enough to fail hard enough."
|
|
|
Post by Winter_King on Jul 9, 2018 9:01:57 GMT
I thought BVS had higher highs and lower lows than Justice League.
|
|
|
Post by RedDeadFallout on Jul 9, 2018 11:38:09 GMT
Why does anyone think that? It doesn't really matter, they're just different examples of pathetic.
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Jul 9, 2018 18:14:19 GMT
For many people, JL was more inoffensive than BvS.
|
|
|
Post by hobowar on Jul 9, 2018 19:39:31 GMT
For many people, JL was more inoffensive than BvS. This is exactly where I stand.
|
|
|
Post by Larcen26 on Jul 10, 2018 14:41:25 GMT
Why does anyone think that? Because it was. On nearly every level. It is far from perfect, but it at least gets the characters right. BvS had a great visual style, moments that look great on commercials and trailers, but that was it.
|
|
|
Post by DSDSquared on Jul 11, 2018 12:10:57 GMT
Why does anyone think that? Because it is. JL was just an average movie, sure, but it was not bad like BvS. BvS was the most poorly put together major blockbuster of all time.
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Jul 11, 2018 12:44:34 GMT
because JL had that lowbrow Marvel-esque Whedon humor that so easily amuses the masses; it's not down to penis, turd & nipples level yet, but still dumbed down considerably.
Judged and assessed by narrative substance (plot, story & notion), cinematography or soundtrack BvS in the long version is artistically superior. There is no discussion about that.
Now, if they could only provide the much-fabeled Snyder cut, eliminating all those badly-lit, pseudo-funny Whedon bits, I might reassess this some time.
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Jul 11, 2018 13:02:26 GMT
For all it's many faults BvS had a few good moments - Day of The Dead, Wonder Woman, some of the the music, I liked Eisenberg. JL on the other hand had nothing I considered memorable or even interesting.
|
|
northernlad
Sophomore
@northernlad
Posts: 898
Likes: 620
|
Post by northernlad on Jul 12, 2018 3:59:28 GMT
I think JL is a lot more fun than BvS. I can actually rewatch JL, but the thought of having to rewatch BvS would just seem like a huge chore. It was just wrong looking back at it now. That's not saying JL is perfect. I think JL has (had) a lot of good ideas, unfortunately that's about all it was...with little development for those ideas. Still, like I said, it is a lot of fun.
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Jul 15, 2018 1:08:29 GMT
Why does anyone think that? ......... honestly most people seem like JL better because it's more colorful, and.... it's lighter? i mean you have that youtuber bandit(something) and he likes JL because Superman smiles......... i mean........ jesus, that was a really superficial reason to like a movie, but idk.
i know that bvs is or can be pretentious, it's "dark," and rubbed people the wrong way when it came to "certain" characterizations, but........ it had an identity, it made decisions. JL feels like........nothing, there are moments that are somewhat interesting, but the way it's edited where every scene feels inconsequential, how it's frankensteined from two directors..... it becomes not much of anything. and JL feels smaller in scale than BvS, MoS, WW and shit...... even SS......
|
|
|
Post by Larcen26 on Jul 16, 2018 15:59:11 GMT
Why does anyone think that? ......... honestly most people seem like JL better because it's more colorful, and.... it's lighter? i mean you have that youtuber bandit(something) and he likes JL because Superman smiles......... i mean........ jesus, that was a really superficial reason to like a movie, but idk.
i know that bvs is or can be pretentious, it's "dark," and rubbed people the wrong way when it came to "certain" characterizations, but........ it had an identity, it made decisions. JL feels like........nothing, there are moments that are somewhat interesting, but the way it's edited where every scene feels inconsequential, how it's frankensteined from two directors..... it becomes not much of anything. and JL feels smaller in scale than BvS, MoS, WW and shit...... even SS......
If you are making this argument, I can buy that BvS might technically be better filmmaking in that it has an identity and a point of view. But it fails stupendously on virtually every level of storytelling and character.
|
|