|
Post by Nalkarj on Jul 19, 2018 21:07:37 GMT
Inspired by my seeing the latest Dan Brown thriller at a stand at the train station, here’s a Dan Brown game! Rules: 1. Invent the wildest, wackiest, most ludicrous conspiracy theory you can find. Importantly, don’t adapt a previously-expressed crazy theory; please make one up on your own. That will prove that you already possess more creativity than Dan Brown. 2. Research details about your crazy theory. For example, if your theory involved, say, Napoleon being 3/4 equine, then research Napoleon and horses. 3. Write a passage from a hypothetical Dan Brown novel about your nutso theory. Must include Robert Langdon, a heroine who never does anything heroic but only hangs breathlessly on Langdon’s every word, and a wise old professor type who at first sounds like a kook but, of course, really is a kook. 4. Take some real-life information from Step 2 and pepper your passage with it! Make it sound as convincing as possible! 5 [optional]. Sell the idea to the real-life Dan Brown and make millions from it!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2018 23:07:50 GMT
Nah, I'm good.
Also, have you ever read any Dan Brown, or are you just hopping on the popular bandwagon?
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Jul 19, 2018 23:14:13 GMT
Nah, I'm good. Also, have you ever read any Dan Brown, or are you just hopping on the popular bandwagon? The Da Vinci Code. Story and plotting good, writing and history atrocious. The movies are fun, though; so was the book, in spite of the writing. But I always spoof stuff that I like.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2018 23:37:18 GMT
Nah, I'm good. Also, have you ever read any Dan Brown, or are you just hopping on the popular bandwagon? The Da Vinci Code. Story and plotting good, writing and history atrocious. The movies are fun, though; so was the book, in spite of the writing. But I always spoof stuff that I like. Fair enough. He's not the best technical prose writer for sure, but his stories are entertaining as hell, and he ALWAYS fools me with his plot twists. I enjoy his books a lot, except for the latest, where he ditched the well-worn formula and the result sucked. I disagree about the movies; Ron Howard has made them virtually unwatchable for me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2018 16:35:44 GMT
If you can bear to drag yourself through another of his books, try Inferno. I think it's his best, much better than Da Vinci Code.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Jul 20, 2018 16:47:33 GMT
Inspired by my seeing the latest Dan Brown thriller at a stand at the train station, here’s a Dan Brown game! Rules: 1. Invent the wildest, wackiest, most ludicrous conspiracy theory you can find. Importantly, don’t adapt a previously-expressed crazy theory; please make one up on your own. That will prove that you already possess more creativity than Dan Brown. 2. Research details about your crazy theory. For example, if your theory involved, say, Napoleon being 3/4 equine, then research Napoleon and horses.3. Write a passage from a hypothetical Dan Brown novel about your nutso theory. Must include Robert Langdon, a heroine who never does anything heroic but only hangs breathlessly on Langdon’s every word, and a wise old professor type who at first sounds like a kook but, of course, really is a kook. 4. Take some real-life information from Step 2 and pepper your passage with it! Make it sound as convincing as possible! 5 [optional]. Sell the idea to the real-life Dan Brown and make millions from it! Better yet, have Dan Brown's research team conduct this research while you sip daquiris by the pool, just as the real Dan Brown likely does !
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Jul 20, 2018 17:30:07 GMT
If you can bear to drag yourself through another of his books, try Inferno. I think it's his best, much better than Da Vinci Code. I probably will try another one day, so thanks for the recommendation. (I saw the movie and thought it was about as interesting as watching paint dry, but the book may be much better.) I should point out that, in spite of my criticisms, I quite liked The Da Vinci Code in a pulpy kind of way.
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Jul 20, 2018 18:03:34 GMT
Better yet, have Dan Brown's research team conduct this research while you sip daiquiris by the pool, just as the real Dan Brown likely does ! Touché, Amy, touché! My own attempt for this game:
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Jul 20, 2018 18:22:37 GMT
Better yet, have Dan Brown's research team conduct this research while you sip daiquiris by the pool, just as the real Dan Brown likely does ! Touché, Amy, touché! My own attempt for this game: Salzmank takes the day with a post far more engaging than anything Dan Brown ever wrote--and far funnier!
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Jul 20, 2018 19:25:56 GMT
Touché, Amy, touché! My own attempt for this game: Salzmank takes the day with a post far more engaging than anything Dan Brown ever wrote--and far funnier! Many thanks. It was fun to write, too.
|
|
|
Post by cooly44 on Jul 23, 2018 16:30:51 GMT
I read one Dan Brown paperback that a friend told me was good. (I know.)
It was about some scientists in the north pole or somewhere who find some particle in the ice and they all get killed and then it winds up with some crooked Republican being exposed by his former girlfriend and the two main characters fall in love and boink.
I can't remember the title.
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Jul 23, 2018 16:50:19 GMT
I read one Dan Brown paperback that a friend told me was good. (I know.) It was about some scientists in the north pole or somewhere who find some particle in the ice and they all get killed and then it winds up with some crooked Republican being exposed by his former girlfriend and the two main characters fall in love and boink. I can't remember the title. This one? How was it?
|
|
|
Post by cooly44 on Jul 23, 2018 18:05:03 GMT
Yes, that's it.
Well it was a page turner and completely implausible. The characters were all card stock. It's beach reading.
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Jul 23, 2018 18:08:32 GMT
Yes, that's it. Well it was a page turner and completely implausible. The characters were all card stock. It's beach reading. So… Typical Dan Brown? Seriously, it’s fun to pick on the guy, but I don’t begrudge him his success; my only real problem is when he says that all of his background is true, when it’s not, yet still defends to the hilt even after it’s been debunked. I thought The Da Vinci Code was fun, but I would have enjoyed it more, probably, if he’d left off the “everything in this book is true” bit. I wonder who everyone here thinks is the best of the “beach writers.” Grisham?
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Aug 10, 2018 17:55:07 GMT
John Hanson (1721-1783) was a Marylander who served as the first president of Congress after that body adopted the Articles of Confederation in 1781. Because he had the title “president” (though, of course, his position was more akin to a very weak Speaker of the House), some [mistaken] people say that he, not George Washington, was the first president of the United States. John Hanson (?-c. 1860) was an Americo-Liberian senator who had absolutely no connection to the white Marylander. So, of course, some sources on the Internet, in some weird attempt to say that the first president of the United States was a black man, show this John Hanson as the first John Hanson and claim that this John Hanson was the first president of the United States. Of course the first Hanson wasn’t the first president either. Anyway. I want Dan Brown to write a book “proving” this conspiracy theory. Connecting it with the Freemasons, the Catholic Church, and the Koch Brothers will, of course, be a given. Who’s with me?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2018 18:02:22 GMT
John Hanson (1721-1783) was a Marylander who served as the first president of Congress after that body adopted the Articles of Confederation in 1781. Because he had the title “president” (though, of course, his position was more akin to a very weak Speaker of the House), some [mistaken] people say that he, not George Washington, was the first president of the United States. John Hanson (?-c. 1860) was an Americo-Liberian senator who had absolutely no connection to the white Marylander. So, of course, some sources on the Internet, in some weird attempt to say that the first president of the United States was a black man, show this John Hanson as the first John Hanson and claim that this John Hanson was the first president of the United States. Of course the first Hanson wasn’t the first president either. Anyway. I want Dan Brown to write a book “proving” this conspiracy theory. Connecting it with the Freemasons, the Catholic Church, and the Koch Brothers will, of course, be a given. Who’s with me? Nice idea. Naturally, it would be a fictional pair of billionaire brothers. Twins who own a genetics company, which ties in with the theme of race, because they're doing something shady with it.
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Aug 10, 2018 18:03:30 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Aug 10, 2018 18:09:07 GMT
John Hanson (1721-1783) was a Marylander who served as the first president of Congress after that body adopted the Articles of Confederation in 1781. Because he had the title “president” (though, of course, his position was more akin to a very weak Speaker of the House), some [mistaken] people say that he, not George Washington, was the first president of the United States. John Hanson (?-c. 1860) was an Americo-Liberian senator who had absolutely no connection to the white Marylander. So, of course, some sources on the Internet, in some weird attempt to say that the first president of the United States was a black man, show this John Hanson as the first John Hanson and claim that this John Hanson was the first president of the United States. Of course the first Hanson wasn’t the first president either. Anyway. I want Dan Brown to write a book “proving” this conspiracy theory. Connecting it with the Freemasons, the Catholic Church, and the Koch Brothers will, of course, be a given. Who’s with me? Nice idea. Naturally, it would be a fictional pair of billionaire brothers. Twins who own a genetics company, which ties in with the theme of race, because they're doing something shady with it. Ooo. I like it!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2018 18:18:08 GMT
Just so you know, Dan, I still love you even though your last book was a clunker.
|
|