|
Post by pimpinainteasy on Aug 21, 2018 12:26:24 GMT
NORMAN MAILER
|
|
|
Post by dirtypillows on Aug 24, 2018 7:22:23 GMT
Pynchon? He certainly can make a sentence go on, and on, and on. David Foster Wallace wasn't exactly skilled in the art of brevity, either. I read one of DFW's essays, something about the plight of the lobster (I'm sure it was a metaphor), and I just could not get into it. I took a peek at his book "Infinite Jest", and there was just no way. I am sure the man was brilliant and gifted, God rest his sad soul, but from what little I read, he seemed verrry long-winded and totally inaccessible.
|
|
|
Post by Fetzer Zinfandel on Aug 26, 2018 23:23:19 GMT
Proust.
And living: John Irving.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Aug 27, 2018 16:20:09 GMT
Pynchon? He certainly can make a sentence go on, and on, and on. David Foster Wallace wasn't exactly skilled in the art of brevity, either. I read one of DFW's essays, something about the plight of the lobster (I'm sure it was a metaphor), and I just could not get into it. I took a peek at his book "Infinite Jest", and there was just no way. I am sure the man was brilliant and gifted, God rest his sad soul, but from what little I read, he seemed verrry long-winded and totally inaccessible. I find some of his earlier essays very accessible, and really funny in a snarky way; and I'm even willing to wade through the plethora of footnotes. But he was not designed to be a writer of the long-form novel, which unfortunately always seems to attract the undisciplined logorrheics (who are often tagged by their editors as 'geniuses', and thus never given the proper editorial guidance and restraint), and DFW was always on the cusp of being one of those. I can't read any of his attempts at novels, and even found some of his latter essays began to slide into the form of too much shapeless wordiness that he seemed to be losing the ability or willingness to prune into more accessible shape.
|
|
hanswilm
Sophomore
old imdb name was Hans-Wilhelm but this site tweaked it to hanswilm
@hanswilm
Posts: 679
Likes: 416
|
Post by hanswilm on Sept 4, 2018 19:16:13 GMT
I just finished "The Stand" by Stephen King. 1,439 pages. A lot of it was good writing and interesting plot but believe you me there were plenty of times I was just like.....GET ON WITH IT! I thought.....oh no, not another new character at page 400 that we now will get 15 pages of background on and character development. At the end on the journey back to Bolder, Co., after he drug that out for 30-40 pages, I was like CAN THEY JUST GET THERE ALREADY? Just skip ahead to them arriving. SHEEEESH!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2018 20:10:00 GMT
I just finished "The Stand" by Stephen King. 1,439 pages. A lot of it was good writing and interesting plot but believe you me there were plenty of times I was just like.....GET ON WITH IT! I thought.....oh no, not another new character at page 400 that we now will get 15 pages of background on and character development. At the end on the journey back to Bolder, Co., after he drug that out for 30-40 pages, I was like CAN THEY JUST GET THERE ALREADY? Just skip ahead to them arriving. SHEEEESH! The first time I read The Stand, although I didn't know it at the time, it was the shorter version. I still have it, around 800 pages and I loved it. Then I found out about the longer version and I hoped it would be even better but it was really tough to get through. I didn't enjoy it nearly as much. Less is more.
|
|