|
|
Post by captainbryce on Aug 10, 2018 10:53:47 GMT
What do you guys think? Has Cody™ made enough of a fool of himself, getting pwned by enough people on his racist thread that we should have some sympathy and retire that thread at this point? |
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Aug 10, 2018 10:59:58 GMT
I voted no. Reason being because not one person has come close to pawning me.
Unless your idea of “pawning” is hysterically shouting “racist!” at someone?
|
|
|
|
Post by captainbryce on Aug 10, 2018 11:05:25 GMT
I voted no. Reason being because not one person has come close to pawning me. Unless your idea of “pawning” is hysterically shouting “racist!” at someone? Dude, everyone on your own thread has destroyed your racist argument in about a dozen ways I’d say that qualifies as pwnage (your cognitive dissonance notwithstanding).  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2018 11:07:03 GMT
I voted no. Reason being because not one person has come close to pawning me. Unless your idea of “pawning” is hysterically shouting “racist!” at someone?  |
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Aug 10, 2018 11:07:53 GMT
I voted no. Reason being because not one person has come close to pawning me. Unless your idea of “pawning” is hysterically shouting “racist!” at someone? Everyone on your own thread has destroyed your racist argument in about a dozen ways I’d say that qualifies as pwnage (your cognitive dissonance notwithstanding). No, they haven’t. They’ve offered a differing opinion that is all. They’ve misrepresented and straw man’d me over and over again. Btw what’s racist about my argument? |
|
|
|
Post by captainbryce on Aug 10, 2018 11:12:19 GMT
Everyone on your own thread has destroyed your racist argument in about a dozen ways I’d say that qualifies as pwnage (your cognitive dissonance notwithstanding). No, they haven’t. They’ve offered a differing opinion that is all. They’ve misrepresented and straw man’d me over and over again. Btw what’s racist about my argument? The fact that you can’t answer my question on it for one thing! The question is, what ISN’T racist about it?  |
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Aug 10, 2018 11:14:47 GMT
No, they haven’t. They’ve offered a differing opinion that is all. They’ve misrepresented and straw man’d me over and over again. Btw what’s racist about my argument? The fact that you can’t answer my question on it for one thing! The question is, what ISN’T racist about it? The fact that I can’t be bothered to answer your stupid question is racist? Okaaaaaay LOL |
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Aug 10, 2018 11:18:22 GMT
Everyone on your own thread has destroyed your racist argument in about a dozen ways I’d say that qualifies as pwnage (your cognitive dissonance notwithstanding). No, they haven’t. They’ve offered a differing opinion that is all. They’ve misrepresented and straw man’d me over and over again. Btw what’s racist about my argument? The fact that by calling the mixing of races in the media "sinister" you negatively discriminate on the basis of colour. I hope that helps. |
|
|
|
Post by captainbryce on Aug 10, 2018 11:47:53 GMT
I know know guys, this one seems to be a glutton for more punishment! He even voted against himself,  Pile on! |
|
|
|
Post by mslo79 on Aug 13, 2018 7:57:21 GMT
Let me guess... he's "racist" because he don't support your left-ist views? (that seems to be the case with many on the left as they seem to default to calling someone 'racist' if they got nothing else etc)
that seems to be the general pattern from election-to-election with the left as they preach the right is racist/sexist/homophobic etc etc and it's all BS as some stuff they claim racism for is laughable and for 'homophobic', it's simply a matter of basic God given morality in why we oppose it (basic right vs wrong stuff) as it makes no sense to support something that God see's as immoral as if something is immoral in the eyes of God that basically makes it a evil thing in a basic sense. so naturally someone who believe in Jesus Christ won't support the gay agenda and the like.
p.s. if I am wrong... where is the racist post?
|
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Aug 13, 2018 8:42:07 GMT
Let me guess... he's "racist" because he don't support your left-ist views? (that seems to be the case with many on the left as they seem to default to calling someone 'racist' if they got nothing else etc) that seems to be the general pattern from election-to-election with the left as they preach the right is racist/sexist/homophobic etc etc and it's all BS as some stuff they claim racism for is laughable and for 'homophobic', it's simply a matter of basic God given morality in why we oppose it (basic right vs wrong stuff) as it makes no sense to support something that God see's as immoral as if something is immoral in the eyes of God that basically makes it a evil thing in a basic sense. so naturally someone who believe in Jesus Christ won't support the gay agenda and the like. p.s. if I am wrong... where is the racist post?
Oh, and no-one brought up "gay agendas" in this thread. Obsessed, much? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2018 11:36:05 GMT
No, they haven’t. They’ve offered a differing opinion that is all. They’ve misrepresented and straw man’d me over and over again. Btw what’s racist about my argument? The fact that by calling the mixing of races in the media "sinister" you negatively discriminate on the basis of colour. I hope that helps. Ding ding ding, and we have a winner. Clearly the thread is rooted in racism. It's also just... kind of dumb. As I and others demonstrated. But then all racism is dumb anyway, so that was unavoidable. |
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Aug 13, 2018 11:51:42 GMT
The fact that by calling the mixing of races in the media "sinister" you negatively discriminate on the basis of colour. I hope that helps. Ding ding ding, and we have a winner. Clearly the thread is rooted in racism. It's also just... kind of dumb. As I and others demonstrated. But then all racism is dumb anyway, so that was unavoidable. No the sinister part is that based on my observation they’re overwhelmingly promoting one particular couple variation(white female/black male) and ignoring all other race combinations. I have no problem with race mixing in general or the promotion of racial harmony. |
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Aug 13, 2018 12:51:51 GMT
Ding ding ding, and we have a winner. Clearly the thread is rooted in racism. It's also just... kind of dumb. As I and others demonstrated. But then all racism is dumb anyway, so that was unavoidable. No the sinister part is that based on my observation they’re overwhelmingly promoting one particular couple variation(white female/black male) and ignoring all other race combinations. I have no problem with race mixing in general or the promotion of racial harmony. Actually you didn't verify that.
I was watching TV this morning and I was furious that the overwhelming agenda was all these monoracial couples popping up on the screen. 
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2018 13:17:15 GMT
Ding ding ding, and we have a winner. Clearly the thread is rooted in racism. It's also just... kind of dumb. As I and others demonstrated. But then all racism is dumb anyway, so that was unavoidable. No the sinister part is that based on my observation they’re overwhelmingly promoting one particular couple variation(white female/black male) and ignoring all other race combinations. No, that's the dumb part. Sure you don't. That's why seeing mixed race couples is so sinister to you. Because you don't have a problem with it. |
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Aug 13, 2018 13:24:12 GMT
No the sinister part is that based on my observation they’re overwhelmingly promoting one particular couple variation(white female/black male) and ignoring all other race combinations. I have no problem with race mixing in general or the promotion of racial harmony. Actually you didn't verify that.
I was watching TV this morning and I was furious that the overwhelming agenda was all these monoracial couples popping up on the screen.
Exactly. In fact, two more UK posters confirmed it, and I verified it for a German station: In advertising, mixed-race couples are outnumbered by far by mono-race couples. Yet, Cody™ mentioned a sinister agenda in favour of a combination that is not the most common combination. Why assume an agenda, if not because you take offense to a rare combination on screen? And objecting to a couple type being depicted, and only mentioning their skin color as indicator for a "sinister agenda" at work, invites to assumptions of racism. Conclusion: Calling Cody™ racist is less of a stretch than assuming a "sinister agenda" behind occasionally showing mixed-race couples next to a whole bunch of mono-race couples. Not to mention that "races" don't exist. But that's another story. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2018 14:32:14 GMT
Let me start by making one thing clear. I am not a racist Would you approve of your daughter dating a black man? |
|
|
|
Post by rachelcarson1953 on Aug 13, 2018 15:19:20 GMT
The fact that by calling the mixing of races in the media "sinister" you negatively discriminate on the basis of colour. I hope that helps. Ding ding ding, and we have a winner. Clearly the thread is rooted in racism. It's also just... kind of dumb. As I and others demonstrated. But then all racism is dumb anyway, so that was unavoidable. I've spent a large amount of time in my career in marketing; focus groups, target markets, demographics, etc. If the media is showing more mixed race couples, it's because there are more mixed race couples, and they spend money, too. Commercials are about the money, the company advertising is trying to sell more of their product. They don't give a rat's a$$ about influencing some cultural change, they are just trying to sell as much product or service that they offer, and appealing to varied ethnic groups is simply part of that. Marketing 101. Nothing sinister about it. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2018 19:56:35 GMT
Ding ding ding, and we have a winner. Clearly the thread is rooted in racism. It's also just... kind of dumb. As I and others demonstrated. But then all racism is dumb anyway, so that was unavoidable. I've spent a large amount of time in my career in marketing; focus groups, target markets, demographics, etc. And how many meetings did you sit in where you were told the agenda about making white women sleep with black guys?!?! |
|
|
|
Post by rachelcarson1953 on Aug 13, 2018 20:42:56 GMT
I've spent a large amount of time in my career in marketing; focus groups, target markets, demographics, etc. And how many meetings did you sit in where you were told the agenda about making white women sleep with black guys?!?! Lol, ZERO! Well, on second thought,  when I worked for Hallmark, they had a kid's licensed property - Rainbow Brite - where all the young characters were diverse, and dressed in a color of the rainbow. There were several characters that had a different skin color or ethnicity, but neither of the boys were black. And they were young, so nobody was sleeping with anybody... but I suppose it could have been misconstrued that since diversity is okay, then white women should sleep with black men... NOT!
The agenda was always about making more money!$!$ |
|
when I worked for Hallmark, they had a kid's licensed property - Rainbow Brite - where all the young characters were diverse, and dressed in a color of the rainbow. There were several characters that had a different skin color or ethnicity, but neither of the boys were black. And they were young, so nobody was sleeping with anybody... but I suppose it could have been misconstrued that since diversity is okay, then white women should sleep with black men... NOT!