|
Post by maya55555 on Aug 16, 2018 20:58:29 GMT
LifeNews.com Pro-Life News Report Tuesday, August 14, 2018
Top Stories • Chelsea Clinton Claims Aborting 60 Million Babies Since Roe “Added $3.5 Trillion to Our Economy” • “Will and Grace” Actress Debra Messing Wears “1973” Necklace to Celebrate Abortion • Abortion Clinic in Nashville, Tennessee Closes Down Permanently • Abortion Activist Amanda Marcotte Calls Unborn Baby a “Lentil-Sized, Brainless Embryo”
More Pro-Life News • Poll Has Terrible News for Abortion Activists: Women Don’t Consider Themselves Feminists • Wendy Davis: Aborting My Baby Was a Decision of “Empathy and Understanding” • Man Drives Up to Pro-Life Advocate and Points a Loaded Rifle in His Face • City Workers Make Gruesome Find, Discover Body of Dead Unborn Baby in Plastic Bag • Scroll Down for Several More Pro-Life News Stories
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Aug 16, 2018 21:36:38 GMT
After that 3.5 trillion went into our economy, where did it go from there? It certainly didn't go toward paying down the Deficit. Or did Obama increase it so much that the 3.5 trillion paydown went unnoticed?
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Aug 16, 2018 22:13:58 GMT
"Pro-lifers", or Anti-Choicers as they should be called, are among the lowest scum of the Earth, right with SS officers or other goons of totalitarian regimes.
Thanks for reminding me.
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Aug 16, 2018 22:58:31 GMT
"Pro-lifers", or Anti-Choicers as they should be called, are among the lowest scum of the Earth, right with SS officers or other goons of totalitarian regimes. Thanks for reminding me. I doubt that simply appointing conservative judges will bring about any change in abortion law. The Constitution doesn't define when life begins, rights begin, or what a marriage means either. Those changes will require a change in quite many people's hearts and minds and some Constitutional amendments such as quite many states did pass to their own state constitutions on same sex marriage. Donald Trump might not be the leader those movements need. He does appear to be gaining support among Republicans, but that might not mean as much as some people think. Because Trump is not on the ballot in November and because Republicans need voter feedback on Trump they are aligning themselves with him, sometimes against their better judgement. His intense nationalism might not be the formula for the sort of winning, popular conservatism needed. Too many people these days rate their own merits by looking at the flaws in their opponents. Obviously Democrats only need focus on Trump's unpopularity, they do not much need to show any math. It is also true though that many Republicans have no ideas either, other than that the Democrats have none. The truth is both parties could use a whole new brand of leadership that went to better schools.
|
|
|
Post by captainbryce on Aug 17, 2018 0:55:37 GMT
FAKE NEWS
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 17, 2018 23:58:54 GMT
"Pro-lifers", or Anti-Choicers as they should be called, are among the lowest scum of the Earth, right with SS officers or other goons of totalitarian regimes. Thanks for reminding me. I agree that the pro life brand of anti-choicers are scum, but a particularly delusional brand of scum. I value consent, which means that I am vehemently opposed to people playing God with the wellbeing of others when it isn't called for. That makes me anti-choice, because I resent the fact that I was imposed upon without my consent (which is a reasonable thing to be resentful about).
|
|
|
Post by mslo79 on Aug 25, 2018 5:09:48 GMT
"Pro-lifers", or Anti-Choicers as they should be called, are among the lowest scum of the Earth, right with SS officers or other goons of totalitarian regimes. Thanks for reminding me.
We ain't the ones making it easier for someone to end a babies life in a mothers womb. this cannot possibly be a moral good.
it's pretty obvious that pro-life is good and pro-choice is bad. someone has to be blind not to see that much.
like the pro-choice group sugar-coats a immoral thing (actually it's a evil act to put it bluntly) by labeling it a choice instead of what it really is, which is a life issue.
but nowadays... it's good vs evil, those who don't respect life at it's most innocent stage, which is in a mother womb, will just dispose of it that much easier in other ways to. life becomes less value to people who are for abortion.
also, what are they really choosing? ; they are basically choosing to end a babies life. that cannot be a good thing.
p.s. God is against abortion, satan is for it. pretty easy to see which is good and what's bad
|
|