|
Post by masterofallgoons on Sept 9, 2018 21:01:05 GMT
I am not sure how they are going to explain the ending didn't count. I mean it is one thing to ignore the other movies in the franchise but to ignore the ending of the first movie it is supposed to continue on from makes it difficult to watch the two together in continuity unless Michael going out the window and his body disappearing turns out to be a dream and Laurie was unconscious at the time. I can see why a lot of fans didn't like the cult aspect of 'Halloween 6' and I wasn't a fan of that either but I like Michael as a supernatural character. I am interested in how they are going to explain what happened to Dr Loomis in this continuity. 'Halloween 4, 5 and 6' were the follow ups to his story in the original timeline but if they never happened did he die a different and does he have any living relatives like a son or a daughter this time. I always found it odd they never mentioned if he had kids or relatives in the old series. I don't think they're going to try and change or retcon the endy anyways. In the trailer, the British guy mentions that Michael was shot by Loomis. And even though he "got away" by the end, he was still wounded, so he was probably easy to capture. Yeah. It doesn't change anything from the ending of the first one in the literal sense. It 'doesn't count' in the sense that he wasn't at large forever like it may have felt after the first movie. But it doesn't treat the ending any differently than part 2 did really. And this is essentially another crack at part 2.
|
|
|
Post by merh on Sept 10, 2018 9:32:59 GMT
Wait... Michael has always stalked his family. She was always his sister. No, not in the first one. I haven't watched the movie in years. Since the 90s? Damn... You going to make me? It might have been explained in the second, but they were siblings.
|
|