|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Aug 26, 2018 4:31:45 GMT
I think you would have made a better case for anybody to watch this if you had offered a summary of what it is about, and given your own opinion about the content. Does it attempt to claim that America is Babylon? If so in what sense. Is it literal or allegorical? I did give a brief summary. Didn’t want to go into too much detail and write a whole essay on it, otherwise be no point in you lot watching it. Okay, Cody, I've been on the phone or participating in YouTube live streams for much of the day, but so far I've watched the first forty minutes of the video you posted, and I've got to say that I'm highly impressed with this man's knowledge of Old Testament prophecies (an area where I am weak). I got to the part about "Little Horn" and was reminded of driving home a few nights ago and listening to Coast to Coast on my car radio. The guest was talking about Biblical prophecy and he believes that Prince Charles is the Antichrist. Personally, I think Charles is a little too old and decrepit for that, and I believe I have seen the Antichrist in a vision and he looks very little like Prince Charles. And yet, the guest pointed out that there are two animals on Charles' coat of arms. One of the animals has the body of a leopard, the feet of a bear, and the head of a lion. The other animal is a unicorn which Charles affectionately refers to as his "Little Horn." When I got home I pulled up an image of Charles Windsor's coat of arms on the internet, and it made me think. You can pull up the same image and decide what you think. When I was over at my brother's house on July 4th my nephew asked me something like, "So Uncle Erik, you think the British lost the Revolutionary War on purpose?" And I said, "Yes, I do." I'll go into further detail on this if necessary. In the meantime I'll get back to watching the rest of the video. Thanks for posting it. I like to see stuff like this on the board. It's a refreshing break from the debate about which bathroom transgenders should use, or the right or wrong of white people wearing dreadlocks. These distractions, however funny they may be, are still distractions. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Aug 26, 2018 5:13:25 GMT
Admittedly sometimes it's hard to tell when the End Times actually begin. For instance, 1989 saw the end of the Cold War and the gradual move toward a one-world authority. I had my awakening in 2012, but that's simply when I recognized that the End Times were real and we were in them. Some believe the End Times began two thousand years ago (not allowing for any missing centuries) with the Crucifixion and the Resurrection. And if my theory about the Four Horsemen is correct, they began at least one thousand years ago as the European powers began to spread out and colonize the world. The end of the world is just the beginning. In other words, there is no beginning and there is no end. Hopefully we can agree that the old world is far from ideal. It's full of pain, misery, and horror, but bad as it is I'd still rather die with it than live in the brave new world that "progressive" freaks intend to make in the coming years. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Aug 26, 2018 5:46:26 GMT
Hopefully we can agree that the old world is far from ideal. It's full of pain, misery, and horror, but bad as it is I'd still rather die with it than live in the brave new world that "progressive" freaks intend to make in the coming years. Life on earth is about awareness of suffering. This will never change, old or new world. We can only know what we know by experience and what we are living through. Maybe you missed my recent thread about the time traveler. His testimony seems to indicate that in the future suffering will be eliminated. We'll have to wait and see. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Aug 26, 2018 5:57:17 GMT
Maybe you missed my recent thread about the time traveler. His testimony seems to indicate that in the future suffering will be eliminated. We'll have to wait and see. Well, the future is open and anything can happen. Suffering is largely created by fear and self-serving means and agendas. There would have to be a complete shift in understanding and awareness to witness any radical changes. You just don't get it, do you? The future has been planned already, and it will come to fruition in the next fifty years or less. The only question is: Do you want to be a part of it, or not? I don't. I hate it. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Aug 26, 2018 6:07:39 GMT
You just don't get it, do you? The future has been planned already, and it will come to fruition in the next fifty years or less. The only question is: Do you want to be a part of it, or not? I don't. I hate it. Why are you getting all defensive? Are you denying that the future is open? As stated previously, I am denying that the future is open, except for the individual choice of how to deal with it. Think of it like a hurricane coming your way. You can't stop it. All you can do is decide how you want to meet it.  |
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Aug 26, 2018 8:01:59 GMT
I did give a brief summary. Didn’t want to go into too much detail and write a whole essay on it, otherwise be no point in you lot watching it. Okay, Cody, I've been on the phone or participating in YouTube live streams for much of the day, but so far I've watched the first forty minutes of the video you posted, and I've got to say that I'm highly impressed with this man's knowledge of Old Testament prophecies (an area where I am weak). I got to the part about "Little Horn" and was reminded of driving home a few nights ago and listening to Coast to Coast on my car radio. The guest was talking about Biblical prophecy and he believes that Prince Charles is the Antichrist. Personally, I think Charles is a little too old and decrepit for that, and I believe I have seen the Antichrist in a vision and he looks very little like Prince Charles. And yet, the guest pointed out that there are two animals on Charles' coat of arms. One of the animals has the body of a leopard, the feet of a bear, and the head of a lion. The other animal is a unicorn which Charles affectionately refers to as his "Little Horn." When I got home I pulled up an image of Charles Windsor's coat of arms on the internet, and it made me think. You can pull up the same image and decide what you think. When I was over at my brother's house on July 4th my nephew asked me something like, "So Uncle Erik, you think the British lost the Revolutionary War on purpose?" And I said, "Yes, I do." I'll go into further detail on this if necessary. In the meantime I'll get back to watching the rest of the video. Thanks for posting it. I like to see stuff like this on the board. It's a refreshing break from the debate about which bathroom transgenders should use, or the right or wrong of white people wearing dreadlocks. These distractions, however funny they may be, are still distractions. Prince Charles? I very much doubt it. Anyway I think at this moment in time it’s rather futile for Christians to be speculating who the Antichrist might be. The Antichrist will not be revealed until after the NWO one world government has been established. And we’re currently some way off that happening. Christians should really stop trying to guess who the antichrist is or the date of when the world will end as all this does is serve to discredit the bible’s true narrative. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Aug 26, 2018 8:10:23 GMT
Okay, Cody, I've been on the phone or participating in YouTube live streams for much of the day, but so far I've watched the first forty minutes of the video you posted, and I've got to say that I'm highly impressed with this man's knowledge of Old Testament prophecies (an area where I am weak). I got to the part about "Little Horn" and was reminded of driving home a few nights ago and listening to Coast to Coast on my car radio. The guest was talking about Biblical prophecy and he believes that Prince Charles is the Antichrist. Personally, I think Charles is a little too old and decrepit for that, and I believe I have seen the Antichrist in a vision and he looks very little like Prince Charles. And yet, the guest pointed out that there are two animals on Charles' coat of arms. One of the animals has the body of a leopard, the feet of a bear, and the head of a lion. The other animal is a unicorn which Charles affectionately refers to as his "Little Horn." When I got home I pulled up an image of Charles Windsor's coat of arms on the internet, and it made me think. You can pull up the same image and decide what you think. When I was over at my brother's house on July 4th my nephew asked me something like, "So Uncle Erik, you think the British lost the Revolutionary War on purpose?" And I said, "Yes, I do." I'll go into further detail on this if necessary. In the meantime I'll get back to watching the rest of the video. Thanks for posting it. I like to see stuff like this on the board. It's a refreshing break from the debate about which bathroom transgenders should use, or the right or wrong of white people wearing dreadlocks. These distractions, however funny they may be, are still distractions. Prince Charles? I very much doubt it. Anyway I think at this moment in time it’s rather futile for Christians to be speculating who the Antichrist might be. The Antichrist will not be revealed until after the NWO one world government has been established. And we’re currently some way off that happening. It may be closer than you think. And I'll know him when I see him, because I've seen him already. |
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Aug 26, 2018 8:14:27 GMT
Prince Charles? I very much doubt it. Anyway I think at this moment in time it’s rather futile for Christians to be speculating who the Antichrist might be. The Antichrist will not be revealed until after the NWO one world government has been established. And we’re currently some way off that happening. It may be closer than you think. And I'll know him when I see him, because I've seen him already. Explain. I edited my last post btw. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Aug 26, 2018 8:31:41 GMT
It may be closer than you think. And I'll know him when I see him, because I've seen him already. Explain. I edited my last post btw. I'm not following where the world government must be established before the Antichrist reveals himself. From my reading it could be before or after. |
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Aug 26, 2018 9:15:19 GMT
I did give a brief summary. Didn’t want to go into too much detail and write a whole essay on it, otherwise be no point in you lot watching it. Okay, Cody, I've been on the phone or participating in YouTube live streams for much of the day, but so far I've watched the first forty minutes of the video you posted, and I've got to say that I'm highly impressed with this man's knowledge of Old Testament prophecies (an area where I am weak). I got to the part about "Little Horn" and was reminded of driving home a few nights ago and listening to Coast to Coast on my car radio. The guest was talking about Biblical prophecy and he believes that Prince Charles is the Antichrist. Personally, I think Charles is a little too old and decrepit for that, and I believe I have seen the Antichrist in a vision and he looks very little like Prince Charles. And yet, the guest pointed out that there are two animals on Charles' coat of arms. One of the animals has the body of a leopard, the feet of a bear, and the head of a lion. The other animal is a unicorn which Charles affectionately refers to as his "Little Horn." When I got home I pulled up an image of Charles Windsor's coat of arms on the internet, and it made me think. You can pull up the same image and decide what you think. When I was over at my brother's house on July 4th my nephew asked me something like, "So Uncle Erik, you think the British lost the Revolutionary War on purpose?" And I said, "Yes, I do." I'll go into further detail on this if necessary. In the meantime I'll get back to watching the rest of the video. Thanks for posting it. I like to see stuff like this on the board. It's a refreshing break from the debate about which bathroom transgenders should use, or the right or wrong of white people wearing dreadlocks. These distractions, however funny they may be, are still distractions. Prince Charles looks like some unfortunate old man who knows he has no real power. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Aug 26, 2018 9:30:38 GMT
Okay, Cody, I've been on the phone or participating in YouTube live streams for much of the day, but so far I've watched the first forty minutes of the video you posted, and I've got to say that I'm highly impressed with this man's knowledge of Old Testament prophecies (an area where I am weak). I got to the part about "Little Horn" and was reminded of driving home a few nights ago and listening to Coast to Coast on my car radio. The guest was talking about Biblical prophecy and he believes that Prince Charles is the Antichrist. Personally, I think Charles is a little too old and decrepit for that, and I believe I have seen the Antichrist in a vision and he looks very little like Prince Charles. And yet, the guest pointed out that there are two animals on Charles' coat of arms. One of the animals has the body of a leopard, the feet of a bear, and the head of a lion. The other animal is a unicorn which Charles affectionately refers to as his "Little Horn." When I got home I pulled up an image of Charles Windsor's coat of arms on the internet, and it made me think. You can pull up the same image and decide what you think. When I was over at my brother's house on July 4th my nephew asked me something like, "So Uncle Erik, you think the British lost the Revolutionary War on purpose?" And I said, "Yes, I do." I'll go into further detail on this if necessary. In the meantime I'll get back to watching the rest of the video. Thanks for posting it. I like to see stuff like this on the board. It's a refreshing break from the debate about which bathroom transgenders should use, or the right or wrong of white people wearing dreadlocks. These distractions, however funny they may be, are still distractions. Prince Charles looks like some unfortunate old man who knows he has no real power. Looks can be deceiving. Take Laurel and Hardy for example. On film it looked as if Hardy was the better-equipped, but in real life it was Laurel who was the brains of that operation. |
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Aug 26, 2018 9:35:55 GMT
Explain. I edited my last post btw. I'm not following where the world government must be established before the Antichrist reveals himself. From my reading it could be before or after. He will rise to power through the one world government. Only then will his identity be revealed. Without the world government we have no Antichrist. |
|
|
|
Post by geode on Aug 26, 2018 11:55:50 GMT
Prince Charles looks like some unfortunate old man who knows he has no real power. Looks can be deceiving. Take Laurel and Hardy for example. On film it looked as if Hardy was the better-equipped, but in real life it was Laurel who was the brains of that operation. I think this is a bit unfair to Oliver Hardy. It is true that Stan had more of an interest in the behind the camera elements of making their films, such as how they were written and directed. Oliver was more content to create a character through acting. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Aug 26, 2018 12:04:26 GMT
Looks can be deceiving. Take Laurel and Hardy for example. On film it looked as if Hardy was the better-equipped, but in real life it was Laurel who was the brains of that operation. I think this is a bit unfair to Oliver Hardy. It is true that Stan had more of an interest in the behind the camera elements of making their films, such as how they were written and directed. Oliver was more content to create a character through acting. Okay, point taken. And Stan never did a movie with John Wayne, whereas Oliver did.   |
|
