|
Post by Cody™ on Sept 7, 2018 13:04:25 GMT
Honestly can you leftists be any more arrogant and patronising? Who on this board with semblance of common sense has ever argued that all or most Muslims are terrorists and psychos? Or that they’ve never been the victims of oppression?! So what was the hashtag about? You still haven't condemned the rape. You turned it into something else. 😉 Obviously to mock wallies like you who unnecessarily insist on pointing out the obvious whenever a Muslim is criticised for bad behaviour.
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Sept 7, 2018 13:06:32 GMT
So what was the hashtag about? You still haven't condemned the rape. You turned it into something else. 😉 Obviously to mock wallies like you who unnecessary insist on pointing out the obvious whenever a Muslim is criticised for bad behaviour. Can you cite where I've defended Mad Mullah the Rapey Jihadist?
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Sept 7, 2018 13:09:21 GMT
Obviously to mock wallies like you who unnecessary insist on pointing out the obvious whenever a Muslim is criticised for bad behaviour. Can you cite where I've defended Mad Mullah the Rapey Jihadist? I don’t recall you doing that specifically no. What you have done is defend Muslims from accusations you’ve pulled out of your arse. Usually after certain Muslims are in the news for being naughty. Hence the hashtags.
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Sept 7, 2018 13:21:14 GMT
Can you cite where I've defended Mad Mullah the Rapey Jihadist? I don’t recall you doing that specifically no. What you have done is defend Muslims from accusations you’ve pulled out of your arse. Usually after certain Muslims are in the news for being naughty. Hence the hashtags. Link please. Or it never happened. 😉 I do recall you suggesting they shouldn't be allowed in Britain. I think that's a rare occasion I was defending. The only thing close to defence other than that is just the fact that, growing up.at military bases, Muslim terrorists and enemy troops - just another group of folk for my neighbours to bomb. 😇
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Sept 7, 2018 13:52:01 GMT
I don’t recall you doing that specifically no. What you have done is defend Muslims from accusations you’ve pulled out of your arse. Usually after certain Muslims are in the news for being naughty. Hence the hashtags. Link please. Or it never happened. 😉 I do recall you suggesting they shouldn't be allowed in Britain. I think that's a rare occasion I was defending. The only thing close to defence other than that is just the fact that, growing up.at military bases, Muslim terrorists and enemy troops - just another group of folk for my neighbours to bomb. 😇 There you go again with your misrepresentations. I argued against an open border policy and declared that I was in favour of a vetting process as a sensible resolution for Muslims migrant crisis from the Middle East and North Africa. I did suggest that Muslim immigration should be restricted not only because of the potential threat posed by terrorism but also because birth rates are far higher within the Muslim demographic and that puts Europe at risk of eventually kissing goodbye to democracy and being confronted by a future of sharia rule for the next generations of the natives of these lands. Moral of the story letting so many people in from that part of the world can only invite more problems in the long term. And the potentially horrific reality of Europe succumbing to Sharia theocracy. Islamists have been trying to invade and take over Europe for 1400 years. They almost succeeded on a few occasions but for Christian resistance. Now our stupid governments are practically rolling out the red carpet for them to finish the job. Not only that but trying to censor anybody who speaks out against it. It’s madness.
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Sept 7, 2018 13:59:06 GMT
Link please. Or it never happened. 😉 I do recall you suggesting they shouldn't be allowed in Britain. I think that's a rare occasion I was defending. The only thing close to defence other than that is just the fact that, growing up.at military bases, Muslim terrorists and enemy troops - just another group of folk for my neighbours to bomb. 😇 There you go again with your misrepresentations. I argued against an open border policy and declared that I was in favour of a vetting process as a sensible resolution for Muslims migrant crisis from the Middle East and North Africa. I did suggest that Muslim immigration should be restricted not only because of the potential threat posed by terrorism but also because birth rates are far higher within the Muslim demographic and that puts Europe at risk of eventually kissing goodbye to democracy and being confronted by a future of sharia rule for the next generations of the natives of these lands. Good, maybe the young folk will finally know what it means to defend their freedoms, not whine about stupid shit like "trigger" words.
|
|
|
Post by geode on Sept 7, 2018 17:05:40 GMT
Once again the Mormon church has allowed an unfortunate situation to grow into a PR disaster of sorts. They have employed lawyers to battle a victim of a sexual predator who had been in a senior leadership position. This seems to be an attempt to defend the church from harm as if it was a corporation. They seem concerned about the image of the church more than harm to people that was done.
It is very sad since the one who vitimized her is also a victim of sorts. He apparently confessed some of his inappropriate actions to leaders senior to him decades ago, but they kept calling him to important positions anyway. In a way they enabled him instead of getting him therapy. Now, as predicted by some people months ago, the church has taken no action against him in terms of what they would do to a member that had always just been "rank and file" where he would have faced a disciplinary hearing and likely been excommunicated. But to do this would be indicating that mistakes had been made in selecting him to high positions. The Mormon view is that God selected him. But of course God would not select somebody like this who would prey upon the innocent, so the excommunication would be admitting that he was selected by men. So much for divine inspiration.
In another case, a Mormon calling for stopping explicit sexual questions being posed to youth by leaders in "worthiness" interviews is likely to be excommunicated this weekend for heresy. He has not challenged Mormon doctrine but just a long-standing policy. Again they should have just ignored him if they are unwilling to change. Instead they make him and his cause more publically known, and will look bad in the process. They never seem to learn. They will have more members resign and others just drift away. But they will have punished his lack of obedience to the leaders of the church.
On the other hand this lady just did something I would not. Taking advantage of a Fast and Testimony meeting to make accusations in person was a publicity stunt. It was innappropriate as one is supposed to only speak about one's faith.
|
|
|
Post by geode on Sept 8, 2018 19:15:39 GMT
|
|