Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 5, 2018 14:25:37 GMT
I give it a 7/10. The creature suits are great and the underwater scenes are impressive.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Oct 5, 2018 15:26:58 GMT
8/10. Excellent jungle flick with an iconic swamp monster.
|
|
|
Post by sjg on Oct 5, 2018 17:56:51 GMT
5/10
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 5, 2018 18:02:06 GMT
9/10. My favorite Universal monster. The design of the Gill Man is superb and the suit still looks great.
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on Oct 5, 2018 19:11:37 GMT
millennials
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on Oct 5, 2018 19:16:25 GMT
8/10 Gill Man gets overlooked in favor of his more famous Universal brethren but he shouldn't be.
|
|
|
Post by them1ghtyhumph on Oct 5, 2018 20:12:57 GMT
7/10. Sometimes when I rewatch it, I get a 'Frankenstein (1931)' vibe.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 5, 2018 20:54:52 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Archelaus on Oct 5, 2018 21:54:27 GMT
7/10
|
|
|
Post by teleadm on Oct 5, 2018 22:47:12 GMT
7/10
For what it is
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Oct 5, 2018 22:56:55 GMT
10/10
|
|
|
Post by movielover on Mar 11, 2020 0:44:14 GMT
7/10
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Mar 11, 2020 0:54:40 GMT
9/10. My favorite Universal monster. The design of the Gill Man is superb and the suit still looks great.
|
|
|
Post by twothousandonemark on May 22, 2023 4:02:15 GMT
B+
I like its boldness of being mostly a daytime horror movie. Solid character performances by all, the movie nicely takes itself seriously.
I'd probably rank it 4th all-time Universal Monster movies behind only Frankenstein, Dracula, & Bride.
|
|
|
Post by telegonus on May 22, 2023 17:50:19 GMT
It's pretty much the same with me. Competently made, it's almost a caricature of U-I creature feature of the 50s. There's little to distinguish it from the other sci-fi flicks the studio produced back then, but for the look of the title character itself. The studio had no directors of the James Whale caliber in those days; nor even Karl Freund. Tod Browning wasn't a Universal guy but for Dracula. Robert Florey and Rowland Lee came and went, did good work. different from what Whale did. Even in the 40s Uni was better in the genre hungover war years and shortly thereafter than in the 50s. Good to excellent directors came and went, and some journeyman directors could make surprisingly good films. They had Roy William Neill for the Sherlocks, and at his best he was a well above average talent. Jack Arnold just wasn't in the same league. He was competent, never inspired. U-I was a different outfit from Uni, and it showed in everything they made. It was a better fit for Douglas Sirk. I like many of the studio sci-fi pictures, especially the Shrinking Man one and This Island Earth, but something was missing from most of the U-I efforts in that genre. They often feature (much) larger than life creatures, and yet the films themselves lack that quality that the studio back ten or twenty years earlier.
|
|