I don't remember either

Don't you ever get sick of posting your stupid s<>t, when you have NO argument, or if you do, it is so easy to deflate because you are a fool.

I couldn't give a rats what your shrill arguments are based on. All your man-hating and ridiculous turd wave feminist cause is, is a tiny insignificant blip in the grander scheme of things, than your self-entitlements and desperate need for attention from men so you can manipulate and control them. I guess that is no different then to what you claim the evil patriarchy of males have done to women. You will never be strong or empowered as a movement and it is scorned and ridiculed by most people with any inkling of common sense and realism. Something that you don't appear to have been born with.    

She just wants any attention from men and tell them what to do and think. I doubt they pay her much attention in her ordinary life.

… and the real point in all these arguments is to ensure that women get that CHANCE to be able to choose their course of study career and NOT be discriminated against either in the selection process or the  pay scale due to their sex.  ie equality of opportunity.  Neither of the spheres you mention have any intrinsic reason why women can't do them, either physical or mental, so why are these discrepancies?

Endemic discrimination and assumptions about girls and females not being able to do certain professions.  BTW the numbers are swelling at last ( at least here in Australia) with women in traditionally male dominated professions.  There are many women in the mining industry driving heavy moving equipment, there are equal number of female and male medical students, dentists vets and an increasing number of astronomers research scientists computer techs etc.  It takes time to wind back the type of endemic discrimination women have suffered since time began.


Parliamentarians and CEOs are sadly not catching up so fast due to a 'boy's club' mentality.  The last bastions of male domination and ego.

I take your point about the choices of subjects and careers and although there is and could never be 'evidence' however it is a fact that there have been complex reason why women have NOT taken up these careers, often to do with societal (patriarchal) expectations for women that are only gradually being overcome as these things are often self fulfilling and it takes few 'leaders' and role models to encourage others.

A not so 'buzzwordy' explanation for your consideration.




Now this is a very interesting comment that is VERY current in Australian politics, so I will use this as an example.  In this country, unless you nominate as an 'Independent candidate' you must be given pre-section by the 'Party'.  THIS is where the problem lies.  Hence women candidates cannot even get to the election phase without being endorse by the male heavy, 'boy's club' party faithful.  It is a fact that when and if women are pre-selected they do  well in elections.  THEN in our current government ( not the opposition who has an equality programme for women) you get the situation where ( due to the boy's club again ) you only have between 1-6 women in Cabinet.

www.abc.net.au/news/2018-09-13/fact-check-women-in-cabinet-scott-morrison/10230820

Not to speak ill of the dead, butt that is exac
Utter nonsense.

Read this again,wgea.gov.au/addressing-pay-equity/what-gender-pay-gap

This is a reputable government agency.  If you and Toasted Cheese don't accept their
findings on the data available, then it says more about you than me.

Not to speak ill of the dead, but that is exactly what Cash used to do when I posted Government sponsored figures from primary sources and statistics about the reduction of gun deaths in Australia since the introduction of Gun Control Laws and Government buy backs of weapons.  Even the US Government under Obama accepted it.

These are not opinion pieces, these are statutory bodies required to report to Government on the relevant issues.

It is laughable that you two bozos think you know better!

That is quite simply, because it is not the whole point, as reference all through this thread and elsewhere and in the article.  Cherry picking and nit picking does not show a sign of comprehension of a problem, rather the opposite.  

For the dummies.  The actual 'reasons' for this pay gap are part of the problem so a comparison of 'comparable roles' is not relevant where there is discrimination or other reasons preventing an accurate comparison.   That this eludes you baffles me, though I am pretty sure it is your misogynous confirmatory bias.

goz



It isn't cherry picking, the entire argument you are presenting is that the wage gap represents sexism, but even your own links are not showing this. They are simply showing that men earn more.



Of course its relevant. You are not showing that women are paid less for the same work and you are not presenting any evidence at all that womens educational and career choices are not freely taken.

You tell me now Goz, if we were both 16, with the same high school grades, what prevents you from choosing a career in physics, but doesn't prevent me?