|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Oct 11, 2018 15:46:30 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Oct 11, 2018 16:29:28 GMT
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Oct 11, 2018 17:04:47 GMT
Still not as much RDJ. It’s an outrage. J-Law’s gonna be peeved.
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Oct 11, 2018 17:54:05 GMT
Good for her and she's worth every penny.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Oct 11, 2018 18:19:09 GMT
For WW III, Gadot's team is definitely going to come looking for that "ScarJo" money.
|
|
|
Post by darkpast on Oct 11, 2018 19:58:27 GMT
This movie would be better for Disney streaming
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Oct 11, 2018 20:02:20 GMT
This movie would be better for Disney streaming Uh huh... and I'll bet you've got a big fat MBA on the wall that backs that searching piece of business analysis up... right playah?
|
|
|
Post by thenewnexus on Oct 11, 2018 20:39:58 GMT
This movie is a waste and smells like a cash grab.
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Oct 11, 2018 21:54:50 GMT
This movie is a waste and smells like a cash grab. You mean like Venom?
|
|
|
Post by thenewnexus on Oct 11, 2018 23:23:01 GMT
This movie is a waste and smells like a cash grab. You mean like Venom? The difference being Venom is a more interesting character and the idea of movie sounds better than a generic spy movie.
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Oct 11, 2018 23:38:27 GMT
Aren't all Comic Book Movies cash grabs?
|
|
|
Post by James on Oct 12, 2018 0:45:50 GMT
Damn that’s great! I don’t know what else to say but, you go girl!
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Oct 12, 2018 1:08:35 GMT
The difference being Venom is a more interesting character and the idea of movie sounds better than a generic spy movie. Eh, not really. Venom is more entertaining than Black Widow I suppose, but not more interesting. Venom's movie is generic, there really isn't anything new presented and basically all storytelling elements and devices have been done far better in other movies. And if the movie were tied into Spider-Man it would've likely made more opening weekend. We don't really know what the story is for the Black Widow movie, so you cannot really claim it is generic or not yet.
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Oct 12, 2018 1:09:59 GMT
Aren't all Comic Book Movies cash grabs? Not just comic book movies but pretty much all blockbuster fare are, it's really lame argument for somebody to make IMHO given that money is more of value to Hollywood than artistic acclaim.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Oct 12, 2018 17:06:57 GMT
Aren't all Comic Book Movies cash grabs? Not just comic book movies but pretty much all blockbuster fare are, it's really lame argument for somebody to make IMHO given that money is more of value to Hollywood than artistic acclaim. Most films are cash grabs the only ones that aren't are the passion projects, everything else is intended to be done to make money, only exceptions are the films that are done to appease a certain individual who wants to do it and you do it just to keep them sweet.
Also of all the films to claim is a cash grab I don't think this is the one, I mean SJ isn't exactly a name that draws a big box office, Black Widow isn't a Loki who fans love anytime she's on screen, and it's not a product that has no merit to be made.
Someone would have better luck trying to claim it's just a political move by Marvel to dissuade people from thinking all they do are white male movies, and if the climate wasn't what it is today Marvel wouldn't be bothering to do it as they haven't given a monkeys about doing a BW movie for almost a decade already, I mean I think it's kind of bs but atleast you would have wiggle room to not look like a numpty for saying it, imo obviously.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Oct 12, 2018 21:30:45 GMT
Really? Isn't that quite... I don't know, excessive?
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Oct 12, 2018 23:14:38 GMT
Really? Isn't that quite... I don't know, excessive? It is but, it’s also comparable to her male counterparts compensation within the MCU.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2018 23:20:27 GMT
It's a shame Marvel doesn't have more good female heroes. A Black Widow movie just sounds boring and generic. A Scarlet Witchy Witch movie would've been preferable.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Oct 13, 2018 0:06:17 GMT
Really? Isn't that quite... I don't know, excessive? It is but, it’s also comparable to her male counterparts compensation within the MCU. Not really. According to Google, these are the salaries of the male MCU actors for their first solo movies: RDJ (Ironman) - $500k Hemsworth (Thor) - $150k Evans (CATFA) - $1 million Cumberbatch (Dr. Strange) - $4 million Boseman (Black Panther) - $3 million Paul Rudd (Antman) - $300k So you see, Scarjo is actually getting paid way way more than her male costars for their respective first solo movies. Now you might say this was in part due to different years for movies being made as well as different marketability of each actor. So for a better comparison, let's take a look at how much each person was paid for their role in Infinity War: Evans - $8 million Hemsworth - $12 million Boseman - $2-3 million Ruffalo - $5-6 million Cumberbatch - $5 million Brolin - $5-6 million Pratt - $5 million Holland - $3 million RDJ - $50 million Scarjo - $20 million You'll see with these numbers that Scarjo actually got paid a lot more than her male costars in IW despite having a very minor role in the movie. She had the 2nd biggest salary behind RDJ but RDJ also had the 3rd highest screentime (18 mins) whereas Scarjo only had 5 minutes. Not that there's anything wrong with that. Good on her for making that much money. Just saying, $15 mil seems a bit much.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Oct 13, 2018 0:36:40 GMT
It is but, it’s also comparable to her male counterparts compensation within the MCU. Not really. According to Google, these are the salaries of the male MCU actors for their first solo movies: RDJ (Ironman) - $500k Hemsworth (Thor) - $150k Evans (CATFA) - $1 million Cumberbatch (Dr. Strange) - $4 million Boseman (Black Panther) - $3 million Paul Rudd (Antman) - $300k So you see, Scarjo is actually getting paid way way more than her male costars for their respective first solo movies. Now you might say this was in part due to different years for movies being made as well as different marketability of each actor. So for a better comparison, let's take a look at how much each person was paid for their role in Infinity War: Evans - $8 million Hemsworth - $12 million Boseman - $2-3 million Ruffalo - $5-6 million Cumberbatch - $5 million Brolin - $5-6 million Pratt - $5 million Holland - $3 million RDJ - $50 million Scarjo - $20 million You'll see with these numbers that Scarjo actually got paid a lot more than her male costars in IW despite having a very minor role in the movie. She had the 2nd biggest salary behind RDJ but RDJ also had the 3rd highest screentime (18 mins) whereas Scarjo only had 5 minutes. According to The HR article, Evans and Hemsworth both earned $15 M for their roles in Infinity War. Comparing the salaries earned by each of the actors for their first solo entries in the franchise is baseless for a number of reasons; Each actor's track record outside of the MCU The time difference between each film The franchise's notoriety/earnings at the time the film was made
|
|